I think it's fair to assume that this case will be the catalyst for those laws to modernize.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Realistically, old people who aren't on the internet and live in Victoria would have a very limited amount of information about this guy.
He didn't say that.Really? so you think old people live in isolation and know nothing of current events. Pretty big generaliazation to say such a thing.
Realistically, old people who aren't on the internet
The interesting thing is that she actually took the long way home from Bar Ettiquette.
If I waa going home from there to where she lived, I would have turned left at Victoria Street (better lit and busier) and then right into Lux thingo from there.
She's actually walked past her house on Sydney Road to get to the bridal shop and would turn left into home and left again into Lux.
But maybe that is just the way she always went. Maybe her and her husband would stop and get a kebab on the way home from the pub every other time and she's just walked that way out of drunken habit.
But yeah, the trying to get to the jack shop thing makes sense.
Where was that?
. Bayley must have been confronted with pretty damning evidence for him to eventually admit his guilt and lead police to the burial site.
Also what interests me is what the information that was concealed by the media after the briefing and what caused the distress that was visible at the time. My only suggestions would be:
- they were made aware of his alleged criminal past
- perhaps they were informed that the body was mutilated in some way.
Anybody?
This is what i was thinking. It was announced very quickly that he was to be charged with both rape and murder which leads me to think that either
- somehow they had proof of this (CCTV or witness) and/or
- they convinced him that this was the case (even if it wasnt) and he would be treated leniently if he confessed.
Out of interest i hope this footage is released at some stage.
I believe the media were made aware of his criminal history and other relevant info, and were advised by police to suppress this information in the interests of a fair trial. I don't believe the "shocking info" related to the crime itself.
Think about your own reaction to learning of his past. I know it made me sick in the guts.
Albion station is about 20km away and on a different train line.
Wasn't a journalist physically sick?This is what i was thinking. It was announced very quickly that he was to be charged with both rape and murder which leads me to think that either
- somehow they had proof of this (CCTV or witness) and/or
- they convinced him that this was the case (even if it wasnt) and he would be treated leniently if he confessed.
Out of interest i hope this footage is released at some stage.
Also what interests me is what the information that was concealed by the media after the briefing and what caused the distress that was visible at the time. My only suggestions would be:
- they were made aware of his alleged criminal past
- perhaps they were informed that the body was mutilated in some way.
Anybody?
I meant Anstey... Sorry if I don't remember the name of the station exactly, but I did live on Mitchell st off Stewart st or something... Not far away from hope st.
Maybe they didn't have enough evidence.Still struggling to reconcile the fact that the perp would've been known to police and was going about his business right under the police noses and they didn't have a tail on him, with all the reports from other women coming out now, surely the police could have paid him a visit and asked a few questions well before last saturday night. Coppers would have to know when an ex rapist/murderer, general bad guy is released from prison and where he ends up living, cripes even the most basic cop shows on tv will have the cops pay a visit to any known perps living in the area when an attack has been reported. Well and good to pat the cops on the back for a job well done but I thought their brief was crime prevention, if bigfooty had access to the 'other' cctv we could well have solved the murder too.
People can rant all they like about lenient court sentences but if the coppers spent less time behind the radar gun and more time doing police work there'd be a good chance the streets would be safer tonight.
Upfield Line? Albion Station? Have I understood your post correctly? You went past Albion Station whilst on the Upfield train?
One media report by John Silvester had them set the 'dogs' onto AB before he was arrested but after JM's dissappearance, so all of a sudden they knew him and where he lived, why wait until a girl goes missing before staking out a perp, without quoting his priors, the cops must've known who he was and where he lived yet they let him off the leash, what are the 'dogs' doing now?, lets hope they have got another perp under surveillance and not sitting around eating donuts and drinking coffee, and waiting for another missing persons report before they spring into action.Maybe they didn't have enough evidence.
There have been a few reports. Two of them were on the internet before the JM case (guy on bike, the man who r*ped the Dutch girl), but it's unverified if it's him. They were just similar cases in the same-ish suburb. These other reports all came out after the JM case.
Plus, we don't know how the police got him to confess. There's every chance that the pressure they mounted on him was baseless.
I wouldn't go blaming Vicpol yet.
Can we post information that has been published in newspapers?
The Advertiser goes into a lot more detail.
Defies beyond belief the pathetically short sentence people can be given for vicious crimes - especially repeat offenders.
I am sorry but the firearm stats in the USA DO NOT show that. Guys will not attack defenceless women in Houston or Dallas for fear that they will have their arms blown off legally.
One media report by John Silvester had them set the 'dogs' onto AB before he was arrested but after JM's dissappearance, so all of a sudden they knew him and where he lived, why wait until a girl goes missing before staking out a perp, without quoting his priors, the cops must've known who he was and where he lived yet they let him off the leash, what are the 'dogs' doing now?, lets hope they have got another perp under surveillance and not sitting around eating donuts and drinking coffee, and waiting for another missing persons report before they spring into action.