It's a really strange situation. I think their chosen this path to make the economics stack up, plus also not disadvantage City by starting again. But who lines up, resuming from the 22nd minute, all super strange....Wasn't the game stopped after our fans threw flares on the ground? Either way I reckon the fact our end was also throwing things onto the pitch may have been one of the reasons behind the decision to replay.
Also city may not want to have to refund tickets to the biggest game of the year and would prefer to replay it purely for financial reasons.
So will victory have to use a sub for Nani? Such a weird situation.