If it got that far; just as likely a court would throw it out before it got to that stage. And the club is under no obligation to spend $$$ on a court case with basically zero chance of success, just to get info out in the public domain.This is part of the reason I would like us to have taken it to court.
You would have all the umpires up on the stand providing information under oath and could figure out what each of them saw and what they were thinking.
But all is not lost...
I'll give them a little slack because it's early in the piece, and maybe a bit of questioning from the clubs / media / public will draw out more detail.The AFL has gone to ground and refused to provide any details as to why this happened. They are now providing solutions by pulling them out of the ass with no reasoning as to why this will help.
Also, you'd have to assume the clubs - especially ours - will be demanding / getting detail and clarity, as they should on any umpiring / scoring / rules issue, so even if the AFL isn't 100% transparent and answering questions that inquiring minds want answers to, maybe the club(s) will.