Typical Victorian journo bias. The Keays goal was proven to be a goal. The Liberatore kick could not be proven that it was a goal. Thereby lies the difference. And if I remember correctly, the ball sailed over the post and it was judged by the GU that it would have hit the post had the post been high enough.Damo..on an official AFL media site..says it all really in terms of what the AFL really thinks….
IF ...
the Crows and seemingly half of Adelaide this week lost their minds, justifiably, over the Ben Keays non-goal decision ...
THEN ...
thousands of Western Bulldogs supporters were overheard saying something about Tony Liberatore and a karma bus waiting to be driven since the '97 preliminary final.
P.S. Edited for clearance.