1
peternorth
Moderator
- May 6, 2005
- 129,660
- 77,638
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #3,652
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That's possibly the worst outcome for Celtics fans, cause I don't think they will fire Mazzulla if that happens.
That's possibly the worst outcome for Celtics fans, cause I don't think they will fire Mazzulla if that happens.
It’s 150-0 when down 3-0. I’m just happy they didn’t get swept.
BirdI don't consider Ewing, Nique or Iverson all time greats either. Barkley just gets in (just)
Being an all time great means you have to be a top 25-30 player of all time. None of those players or Joel or Harden make my list
I will actually do my own top 30 NBA players of all time list in the off season.
Should be a fun exercise.
what about KGAntoine Walker an obvious oversight... should be at number 4
I dont know if Harden is a top 10 scorer of all time.
I've got Jordan, Wilt, Iverson, K.Malone, Kareem, Kobe, West, Baylor, Durant, LeBron... then guy like Wilkins, Gervin, Shaq, Pettit, the Big O. I'd say Harden would sit somewhere in the 10-15 range maybe.
Top 30 all time probably pushing it too. Top 50ish I reckon is more on the money.
Both Harden and Embiid are clearly all time greats though, Harden already is one and Embiid will be one by the time he is done.
Let me know who decided that.Being an all time great means you have to be a top 25-30 player of all time.
Iverson being a better scorer than Harden is such a bad take.
I mean he is also one of the best play makers in the league for almost a decadeHarden plays zero defence and has very little all round game. There is far more to being a great player than scoring ya now.
Iverson was a better play maker who made his teammates better (least during his prime seasons at Philly)
Harden is definitely a top 40 player of all time, but I personally don't think he will leave a legacy on the game and fondness in the eyes of many long term followers than say Gary Payton Snr (whom I actually now believe is underrated)
That's ridiculous EJ. Harden's offensive game has been extremely well rounded for years.Harden plays zero defence and has very little all round game. There is far more to being a great player than scoring ya now.
Iverson was a better play maker who made his teammates better (least during his prime seasons at Philly)
Harden is definitely a top 40 player of all time, but I personally don't think he will leave a legacy on the game and fondness in the eyes of many long term followers than say Gary Payton Snr (whom I actually now believe is underrated)
I mean he is also one of the best play makers in the league for almost a decade
His prime he lead a team to 7 games against arguably the best of all time. Also almost everyone agrees the league is deeper than it ever has been beforeContext is everything, Harden's prime years was not exactly the strongest period in NBA history to be honest.
If Harden played in the 80s/90s, I suspect his numbers would have been similar to Terry Porter's tbh (and I liked the Egghead really)
Well that's my own personal opinions and views, I just don't think the last 20 Years or so of the NBA has been as strong/good as it has been in the past, and players/champions of it should be ranked accordingly
7His prime he lead a team to 7 games against arguably the best of all time. Also almost everyone agrees the league is deeper than it ever has been before
If a team is ever going to overturn a 0-3 deficit it'll be this 57 win celtics team vs the 44 win Heat.
Oh geez, I cant wait to see this list.I don't consider Ewing, Nique or Iverson all time greats either. Barkley just gets in (just)
Being an all time great means you have to be a top 25-30 player of all time. None of those players or Joel or Harden make my list
I will actually do my own top 30 NBA players of all time list in the off season.
Should be a fun exercise.
Actually fair point, Iverson was a bit of a chucker.Iverson being a better scorer than Harden is such a bad take.
Harden plays zero defence and has very little all round game. There is far more to being a great player than scoring ya now.
Iverson was a better play maker who made his teammates better (least during his prime seasons at Philly)
Harden is definitely a top 40 player of all time, but I personally don't think he will leave a legacy on the game and fondness in the eyes of many long term followers than say Gary Payton Snr (whom I actually now believe is underrated)
Context is everything, Harden's prime years was not exactly the strongest period in NBA history to be honest.
If Harden played in the 80s/90s, I suspect his numbers would have been similar to Terry Porter's tbh (and I liked the Egghead really)
Well that's my own personal opinions and views, I just don't think the last 20 Years or so of the NBA has been as strong/good as it has been in the past, and players/champions of it should be ranked accordingly
Didn't shoot 4swhat about KG
But he lead Boston to the 2008 dynastyDidn't shoot 4s
Would you like me to create the thread?I don't consider Ewing, Nique or Iverson all time greats either. Barkley just gets in (just)
Being an all time great means you have to be a top 25-30 player of all time. None of those players or Joel or Harden make my list
I will actually do my own top 30 NBA players of all time list in the off season.
Should be a fun exercise.
Would you like me to create the thread?