In other news - The Committee on Oversight and Accountability has released a 520 page report on the likely origins of COVID and how effective the response was for those that are interested.
I only got through the first 60 pages or so (they're not very text-dense), but from that it reads to me like they started with their findings, and then tried to gather (/twist) evidence to support them. For example, consider the "finding" on page 5, which is "The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2" was "Prompted" by Dr. Anthony Fauci to "Disprove" the Lab Leak Theory. Here "The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2" is a commentary published in Nature Medicine in early 2020. In the 50+ pages the report spends on this topic, the evidence "supporting" this finding essentially boils down to Fauci saying "Hey, you guys should publish this" when contacted by researchers with some ideas about how to determine the origin of the virus… and then they did publish it. There is a lot of creative (i.e., mis-) interpretation of words taken out of context, but not much substance.
Perhaps other parts of the report are less facile… but I wouldn't hold my breath.