No to Gamble, Rosa and Setanta.
Mitch Duncan and Menzel have already gone past Gamble which indicates that he isn't worth trading for.
Rosa - can he kick?
exceptional kick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
No to Gamble, Rosa and Setanta.
Mitch Duncan and Menzel have already gone past Gamble which indicates that he isn't worth trading for.
Rosa - can he kick?
Rosa is not an exceptional kick!!!
His kicking is the opposite...very average! Just go to the WC board and check them all bagging out his kicking. Turnover merchant...do not want!
Good idea, leave him where he is then.O'Rielly won't be upgraded as he can stay on the rookie list for free (outside the cap and not take up a list position) for another 2 years before and a decision has to be made to upgrade him or not.
im thinking orielly,contin,westoff can all saty on the rookie list with roberts & polak as delistings.
the player that im not sure about is gourdis, if a player can remain 3 years on a rookie list that would mean we dont need to upgrade him untill next year because this is his 2nd year on the rookie list, his first year he was on the senior list !!
can anybody confirm this situation as to why we need to upgrade anybody !
i agree he offers us more than both mcguane & thurstyi reckon needs require we upgrade gourdis to list proper. imo he would be an actual upgrade on the likes of mcguane.
weather hes a genuine long term propisition im not sure but hey rome was not built in a day, and as long as players we promote are an improvement on those we delist its a step in the right direction.
Im not 100% sure, but i think because we dont have anyone on the veterans list we can play a rookies in place (maybe 2) without upgrading them to the senior list. If that is the case O`Reilly will stay rookied.
We can upgrade two rookies at the start of the season, 1 more at the mid season break, and in the place of any players on the long-term injury list.
True, but I was thinking we can play 1 or 2 rookies without upgrading them because we have no players on the veterans list.
Gamble is ok, but not the answer for us imo.
Wrong, it just means you can upgrade them without having to place somebody onto the long term inury list.True, but I was thinking we can play 1 or 2 rookies without upgrading them because we have no players on the veterans list.
LOL at the Weagles for sticking with our junk, they REALLY must be struggling! Worst player I've ever seen pull on the yellow&black.
What are our thoughts on MacKinley? The Griffiths development factor is the only thing holding me back..but he could be an absolute steal! Obviously wasn't enjoying being up at West Coast but still averages around 2 goals a match.
haha..harsh.
2 goals a game when he never wanted to be up there, if there's ever going to be a player that a change of location can really help it could be him. All the things you mentioned are about 1 %'ers, the exact figures that drop off when a player isn't interested, as opposed to lacking talent.
He could be a disappointment, but if there's anyone who has a potentially huge upside for a cheap price it's him.
Pettifer kicked 132 goals from 113 games, MacKinley is already way past him. Pettifer averaged just under 1 goal and under 8 disposals a game at this stage of his career =)