This recruiting team and the one beforehand, put together the side that won the 2008 grandfinal, and 12 months later you're calling for their heads!
I knew there was a reason I hated the general public!!
As Adelaide Hawk stated above, lets just take a chill pill. Dean Cox played in an underperforming team this year. Sandilands absolutely dominates, and Freo suck. We won a flag with two serviceable well coached ruckman, and Collingwood landed top 4 with Fraser and Wood. What does this all mean??? A ruckman is a nice to have. He has to be able to compete. Sometimes he has to be able to nillify. But its the little blokes around his feet that make the difference, and quite frankly, we've got some of the best, most competitive and well coached mids in the league.
The National Draft is a vehicle to build your club for the future. Even the bloke who started this thread has subsequently acknowledged that outside of Rioli and Renouf...rarely do your players have an impact the following year. I can think of Selwood coming straight in. I can think of a few number 1 and 2 draft picks (obviously), but lets not lose our minds that our players won't be having immediate impacts.
The reason we won the flag in 2008 is despite having some absolute guns in Franklin, Mitchell, Hodge, etc, our real improvement came from Bateman, Ladson, Ossie, etc...blokes with near on 100 games under their belt. This will continue to be the way.
And to those people who are losing their nut over not picking up Matt Macguire...I'm not going to lie to you, I was also a bit interested in picking him up...but he slid through to practically one of the last picks of the draft, and even then, was only picked up by freakin' Voss (who appears to have found the Dennis Pagan Manual on Rebuilding lying around). So maybe after all our conjecture, he HAS in fact lost too much pace and has the turning circle of a jumbo jet. Mature aged, strong bodied defenders are not all one and the same. Gone are the days of Gehrig sitting in the goal square asking for the ball to be dropped on his head. You have to be big these days, but you HAVE to be able to run quickly. As a result, sometimes you really just need a guy who is pacey and can get to the fall of the ball. Hawthorn has the runs on the board to have noticed when the game is changing, and sometimes we're the reason it changes.
Give our guys some credit, and stop expecting Jesus Christ to be available at pick 39.
The National Draft excites me because we've built for the future, we've got defenders and we've got rucks who will learn their trade with us. We also did very well in trade week with a goddamn BURGOYNE now playing for us, and Gibson to shore up the backline. We still have the PSD, so maybe we will get a ruckman, but he'll only be a backup, if that.
Mark my words, the Hawks are having a tilt this year, and we'll be singing their praises by July.
I knew there was a reason I hated the general public!!
As Adelaide Hawk stated above, lets just take a chill pill. Dean Cox played in an underperforming team this year. Sandilands absolutely dominates, and Freo suck. We won a flag with two serviceable well coached ruckman, and Collingwood landed top 4 with Fraser and Wood. What does this all mean??? A ruckman is a nice to have. He has to be able to compete. Sometimes he has to be able to nillify. But its the little blokes around his feet that make the difference, and quite frankly, we've got some of the best, most competitive and well coached mids in the league.
The National Draft is a vehicle to build your club for the future. Even the bloke who started this thread has subsequently acknowledged that outside of Rioli and Renouf...rarely do your players have an impact the following year. I can think of Selwood coming straight in. I can think of a few number 1 and 2 draft picks (obviously), but lets not lose our minds that our players won't be having immediate impacts.
The reason we won the flag in 2008 is despite having some absolute guns in Franklin, Mitchell, Hodge, etc, our real improvement came from Bateman, Ladson, Ossie, etc...blokes with near on 100 games under their belt. This will continue to be the way.
And to those people who are losing their nut over not picking up Matt Macguire...I'm not going to lie to you, I was also a bit interested in picking him up...but he slid through to practically one of the last picks of the draft, and even then, was only picked up by freakin' Voss (who appears to have found the Dennis Pagan Manual on Rebuilding lying around). So maybe after all our conjecture, he HAS in fact lost too much pace and has the turning circle of a jumbo jet. Mature aged, strong bodied defenders are not all one and the same. Gone are the days of Gehrig sitting in the goal square asking for the ball to be dropped on his head. You have to be big these days, but you HAVE to be able to run quickly. As a result, sometimes you really just need a guy who is pacey and can get to the fall of the ball. Hawthorn has the runs on the board to have noticed when the game is changing, and sometimes we're the reason it changes.
Give our guys some credit, and stop expecting Jesus Christ to be available at pick 39.
The National Draft excites me because we've built for the future, we've got defenders and we've got rucks who will learn their trade with us. We also did very well in trade week with a goddamn BURGOYNE now playing for us, and Gibson to shore up the backline. We still have the PSD, so maybe we will get a ruckman, but he'll only be a backup, if that.
Mark my words, the Hawks are having a tilt this year, and we'll be singing their praises by July.