The rule change I would LOVE to see
- Thread starter Trip3101
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- May 27, 2006
- 45,639
- 90,880
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- I'm aware of and love the Miami Dolphins
- Moderator
- #2
Lol holy shit
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #4
Why would an injured player kick a goal? If you are injured get off the field before kicking for goal der
WWSD
Premium Platinum
Veteran
10k Posts
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2020
Hawthorn Hawks - James Cousins Player Sponsor 2020
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2019
Hawthorn Hawks - James Cousins Player Sponsor 2019
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2018
Hawthorn Hawks - James Cousins Player Sponsor 2018
- Sep 7, 2009
- 24,285
- 55,000
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #7
I'll make an inception in that case, they can leave the field but they can't come back on for the rest of the game
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
It'll stop all of those injuries to players running from the field after kicking a goal.
- Nov 28, 2007
- 738
- 479
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
The rule change I'd like to see is to allow the player with the ball to have a reasonable opportunity to dispose of the football before he can be tackled.
I'm sick of seeing someone grab a loose ball above his head or below his knees, and being tackled 0.02 seconds later. No matter what happens, there'll be a stoppage.
The onus is on the tackler to give the player with the ball a chance to get rid of it before he can tackle him.
The debate of what reasonable time is, whether it be distance or time or both needs total clarity.
Let's trial it to see what it looks like in practice. It couldn't hurt.
I'm sick of seeing someone grab a loose ball above his head or below his knees, and being tackled 0.02 seconds later. No matter what happens, there'll be a stoppage.
The onus is on the tackler to give the player with the ball a chance to get rid of it before he can tackle him.
The debate of what reasonable time is, whether it be distance or time or both needs total clarity.
Let's trial it to see what it looks like in practice. It couldn't hurt.
- Aug 30, 2013
- 10,701
- 12,714
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Any player that ducks, shoulder shrugs, drops the knees or throws their head back is deemed to have prior opportunity.
- Jan 5, 2013
- 13,880
- 25,677
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I would love to change a rule in Bigfooty that stops people making shit threads
shrekswamp15
Debutant
- Mar 29, 2015
- 144
- 163
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Ffs, I'm tired of everyone who thinks that a player kicks a goal has to come off, there's literally 1000 times a player will kick a goal and stay on, they go off because it is their turn in the rotation and the break in play from a goal being kicked is as good a chance as any to come off
MKMatty
Busy Vibin’
Ohh, that'll hurt Michael Walters.
schnoods
Club Legend
Would Hurt Jack Darling also.
The one rule I'd change is to ban shepherding the man on the mark. If there is a 10m exclusion zone for defenders for the player on the mark, then the team mates shouldn't be allowed in to shepherd. If you wanna take the man on, you should take him on one on one.
- Aug 30, 2013
- 10,701
- 12,714
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
You'd have lost yesterday with that rule.
Or maybe when two players are sprinting and their whole bodies collide, it's incredibly hard to distinguish what hit what in real time, at pace, from one angle. Was the same with Cyril Rioli v Melbourne, and same last night with Naismith v Fisher.
Wow. Kicks a goal. Next contest gets injured?
1 rule change id like to see on bigfooty.
Users under the age of 12 shouldnt be aloud to make threads on the main board.
MKMatty
Busy Vibin’
I disagree. Was a 50/50 call and a fair case can be made for either side. Onus should be on the tackler to go lower, especially if the person they're tacking had that label of "ducker".
I'd love to dig up the Parker elbow and then you try to tell me how NO umpires saw it... but I don't need toOr maybe when two players are sprinting and their whole bodies collide, it's incredibly hard to distinguish what hit what in real time, at pace, from one angle. Was the same with Cyril Rioli v Melbourne, and same last night with Naismith v Fisher.
- Aug 30, 2013
- 10,701
- 12,714
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Hahaha Well, this is my rule & it would have been holding the ball.
We need a rule for stupid people starting threads on BigFooty.
I suggest a punishment of being fired from a cannon into the sun.
I suggest a punishment of being fired from a cannon into the sun.
MKMatty
Busy Vibin’
Just as well you're not making the rules then
Similar threads
