It's awesome to see both Heeney & Jordon in career best form. Both moves have worked out soo far.
Analysis The Stats and nothing but the Stats
- Thread starter Ticky009
- Start date
- Tagged users None
It's awesome to see both Heeney & Jordon in career best form. Both moves have worked out soo far.
Callipygian
Team Player
- May 18, 2021
- 2,292
- 5,149
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Is this list measured somehow in relation to the rest of their careers? If so, it isn't intrinsically a comment on how well they're playing, only about how well they're playing compared to how well they've played previously. And that could be either exciting or an indictment.
In Heeney's case arguably he has underperformed previously but fortunately he is performing so stratospherically well currently that it is not really a knock on him that he wasn't performing as well previously.
In Jordon's case it suggests that he is thriving in our environment and with selection continuity.
Actually, in almost every case it feels like a positive (probably because it is) but possibly in the case of someone like Harry McKay it does suggest that he was underperforming (which he probably wasn't when he was Coleman medallist but is probably true about last year when he had the yips).
It feels most double-edged with the players who have had the longest careers because it's tempting to think "why did it take them so long?" whereas with young players you go "of course. they're developing".
Thanks for sharing.
To their careers. There's a minimum games played requirement. I think it's a good snapshot of their current performance. I only care about the now rather than the past with our best 23 players. Right now those 2 are in career best form for a variety of reasons which is awesome.
Yes it can be misleading in certain situations but I think it's pretty accurate for these 2 players.
That's among the more diverse mixes out there
What a load of BS
- Apr 4, 2021
- 2,180
- 4,928
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- New Orleans Saints
If I'm reading the graph correct, we're the highest rated team from that persons model. It's just that we sit on the red line because we've had pretty much 0 change to our team rating the last 5 games.
Its rating over the last 5 games. In that time we had a loss and a "bad win" over the Eagles.
Compare our position to the Eagles. In their past 5 games, their average really improved but it was worse than the overall average. Since we didn't "improve" on our average over 5 games we are lower on the Y axis but our average is better than the overall average so we are the furthest team on the X axis.
The reason the graph looks so stupid is because North's last 5 games were so bad AND they are bad in general compared to the overall average, to fit all 18 teams in a nice square means the middle of the graph is actually really far off centre
tl;dr lolNorf and we be chillin
Last edited:
Callipygian
Team Player
- May 18, 2021
- 2,292
- 5,149
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Graph says that we're by a small margin the best team and have been consistently at the same level. The bad news is that teams like GWS and Carlton and Geelong are catching up and will overtake us if all our trajectories remain the same, which of course they won't.
The graph is absolutely horrific for NMFC fans. Terrible and getting worse.
The graph is absolutely horrific for NMFC fans. Terrible and getting worse.
Ticky009
Moderator
- Jun 2, 2014
- 24,717
- 64,316
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- The Rebel Alliance
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 9,453
- 26,554
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #164
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Total | |
| Bye | ||||||||||
| Isaac Heeney | 9 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 55 | |
| Errol Gulden | 5 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 34 | |||
| Chad Warner | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 | ||||
| Nick Blakey | 5 | 9 | 5 | 19 | ||||||
| Brodie Grundy | 9 | 9 | 18 | |||||||
| Tom Papley | 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| Oliver Florent | 2 | 5 | 7 | |||||||
| Dane Rampe | 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| James Rowbottom | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| Will Hayward | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| Justin McInerney | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Logan McDonald | 1 | 1 |
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 9,453
- 26,554
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #165
Blakey, Florent and Roberts are the top three for kick-ins
aflratings.com.au
AFL KICK-INS - AFLRATINGS
Latest AFL Fantasy News delivered accurately and efficiently
aflratings.com.au
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 9,453
- 26,554
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #166
Sydney CBA
AFLinsight2023
Rookie
- Mar 3, 2024
- 26
- 387
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
G'day Swannies fans. I'm a bit of a stat head and I just thought I'd share this with you all;
I have 25 years worth of data that shows a pretty strong correlation between a teams offensive efficiency (Inside 50s>Goals), their defensive efficiency (Defensive Inside 50s>Opposition Goals) and the differential between the two being a pretty good guide as to how strongly their game will stand up when it really matters in September.
For example; Last year the Pies Off/Eff was 25.31% whilst their Def/Eff was 20.65% which gave them a differential of +4.66 which was by far and away the best in the comp.
Similarly in 2022, the Cats led the way with a +3.17 and the Swans were 2nd with a +3.06
So far this season, Sydney have an Off/Eff of 26.59% and a Def/Eff of 19.55%, a whopping differential of +7.04 which is good for best in the league.
Anyways, pardon the intrusion and best of luck for the rest of the season...cheers
I have 25 years worth of data that shows a pretty strong correlation between a teams offensive efficiency (Inside 50s>Goals), their defensive efficiency (Defensive Inside 50s>Opposition Goals) and the differential between the two being a pretty good guide as to how strongly their game will stand up when it really matters in September.
For example; Last year the Pies Off/Eff was 25.31% whilst their Def/Eff was 20.65% which gave them a differential of +4.66 which was by far and away the best in the comp.
Similarly in 2022, the Cats led the way with a +3.17 and the Swans were 2nd with a +3.06
So far this season, Sydney have an Off/Eff of 26.59% and a Def/Eff of 19.55%, a whopping differential of +7.04 which is good for best in the league.
Anyways, pardon the intrusion and best of luck for the rest of the season...cheers
Thanks! Great stat.
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 9,453
- 26,554
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #170
Well the umpires will notice Heeney if 81% in CBA 
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 9,453
- 26,554
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #173
13 Bloods have had coaches votes
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Total | |
| Bye | |||||||||||
| Isaac Heeney | 9 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 63 | |
| Errol Gulden | 5 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 33 | ||||
| Chad Warner | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 28 | ||||
| Nick Blakey | 5 | 9 | 5 | 19 | |||||||
| Brodie Grundy | 9 | 9 | 18 | ||||||||
| Oliver Florent | 2 | 5 | 8 | 15 | |||||||
| Tom Papley | 7 | 7 | |||||||||
| Dane Rampe | 7 | 7 | |||||||||
| James Rowbottom | 5 | 5 | |||||||||
| Will Hayward | 5 | 5 | |||||||||
| James Jordon | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
| Justin McInerney | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Logan McDonald | 1 | 1 |
Callipygian
Team Player
- May 18, 2021
- 2,292
- 5,149
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Adding up your totals I conclude that collectively we have won 205/360 (= 57%) coaches votes on offer.
I'm slightly surprised it's not more. I guess we had 2.5 shaky performances.
I'm slightly surprised it's not more. I guess we had 2.5 shaky performances.
We've also had some close games until the final quarter, so players from the opposition did well for most of it
Similar threads
