The "We must get Tom Lynch at all costs...or maybe not" Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Chocco said the same thing about a hour earlier on 5aa. So how real a source is he considering the info was already in the public domain before he posted it.
The fact he has a long history with a number of deals. He got Treloar right, he told us Aish would nominate us when the media were reporting crows or staying at lions... couple days later Aish nominated us, he even said Watts to port last year before it happened.
 
Geeze guys why all the drama??

Lynch has lot's to offer but realistically the tuggers have dominated without a 'power' forward.

We already have a multi faceted forward line that is very hard to close down.

Let's hunt down some KPP's and build some depth in the area of the game that has been a problem for us.

How did that multi-faceted forward line go without Cox against the Eagles.

Couldnt kick a goal after quarter time.
Close the space to lead into and we were forced to kick long which McGovern picked off at will.

We have zero KPF depth.
Reid is cooked, Mihocek under sized.

Moore playing in defence all next year with no Dunn and Scharenberg.
 
How did that multi-faceted forward line go without Cox against the Eagles.

Couldnt kick a goal after quarter time.
Close the space to lead into and we were forced to kick long which McGovern picked off at will.

We have zero KPF depth.
Reid is cooked, Mihocek under sized.

Moore playing in defence all next year with no Dunn and Scharenberg.
Agree to disagree.
 
The fact he has a long history with a number of deals. He got Treloar right, he told us Aish would nominate us when the media were reporting crows or staying at lions... couple days later Aish nominated us, he even said Watts to port last year before it happened.

I think Waldron is alright however in the case of Watts, he was never staying at Melbourne and Port showed more than a passing interest whereas the other clubs were non committal.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Chocco said the same thing about a hour earlier on 5aa. So how real a source is he considering the info was already in the public domain before he posted it.
Scout it about as good as it gets in forumland when it comes to pies info. He works for the club, so generally can’t give too much away, but what he does say is usually spot on, and often before the media.
 
He does know that Pickering has already refuted the North/Moore rumor right?

I'm more concerned that the "female sleuth" doesn't seem to know.

In fairness, to quote old mate, apparently she has only just woken up...
 
Scout it about as good as it gets in forumland when it comes to pies info. He works for the club, so generally can’t give too much away, but what he does say is usually spot on, and often before the media.

I don't think he has worked at the club for 2 seasons now.
 
I don't think he has worked at the club for 2 seasons now.
Well hopefully he’s wrong, but he was bang on about pretty much everything at trade time last year iirc
 
And yet, still part of a three-peat, with a premiership medal to show for it that nobody can take away from him, no matter what the Internet thinks.

I just can't imagine why he might think this way...
Id rather win one flag with a team that only went on to win one instead of joining a side that already won 2 no matter how much you glorify being 1/3 apart of a threepeat. It’s two different circumstances and im saying i’d prefer one of the other. That’s my point, and only my point.

“No matter what the internet thinks” Odd comment, we are all on the Internet discussing players, and we are all very well aware the players don’t care, so do we stop posting on Bigfooty about players because its basically all useless “No matter what the internet thinks”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top