Adelaide's license is "owned" by the SANFL, who own Football Park outright.neither West Coast, Fremantle or Adeliade or Essendon own a football stadium that can hold a reasonable footy attendance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Adelaide's license is "owned" by the SANFL, who own Football Park outright.neither West Coast, Fremantle or Adeliade or Essendon own a football stadium that can hold a reasonable footy attendance
Should the league be no salary cap, no draft etc. then each club will need to own their own stadium, or rent one out.
Right now we have the worst deal with TD in which would mean where west coast generate x amount of money for 40k at subi, we make x/4 for the same attedance. If there is no salary cap, this would be turned on its head.
Above all that, we have rich supporters in which would mean we would be able to afford to pay our player the most. Dick Pratt (and his friends) alone would fund more than any other team combine can be able to fund.
And with promotion and relegation, the weaker teams will drop to lower level comp, allowing for an increase in support for the bigger club, and hence just on that alone, teams like Carlton, Collingwood and Essendon would only grow. And because initially we would be better of (again this is going back to stadium and rich people at the club), we would win more as we'd spend more on players and not paying ground hire... which would win us more games, more flags and hence more fans.
So since the salary cap we've got:
Hawthorn 5 (5 flags, 0 spoons)
Essendon 3 (3 flags, 0 spoons)
West Coast 3 (3 flags, 0 spoons)
Brisbane Lions 2 (3 flags, 1 spoon)
Adelaide 2 (2 flags, 0 spoons)
Kangaroos 2 (2 flags, 0 spoons)
Geelong 1 (1 flag, 0 spoons)
Port Adelaide 1 (1 flag, 0 spoons)
Collingwood 0 (1 flag, 1 spoon)
Carlton -1 (2 flags, 3 spoons)
Fremantle -1 (0 flags, 1 spoon)
Western Bulldogs -1 (0 flags, 1 spoon)
Brisbane Bears -2 (0 flags, 2 spoons)
Fitzroy - 2 (0 flags, 2 spoons)
Melbourne -2 (0 flags, 2 spoons)
Sydney -3 (1 flag, 4 spoons)
Richmond -4 (0 flags, 4 spoons)
St Kilda -4 (0 flags, 4 spoons)
Either my maths is out or your figures were winty, Flags add up to 24 and Spoons to 25....
Obviously that list is very black and white, doesn't take into consideration making Grand Finals or missing out on finals altogether; more recently, finishing top 4 or bottom 4.
I was out mate. Gave the Swans an extra spoon.
Get rid of the salary cap and Carlton and Collingwood would be winning flag after flag, I like the idea of Carlton winning them but not Collingwood.
thanks for believing in us!!!Melbourne have the flag rapped for the next few years, and even then they still wont win a thing.
I'd like to see the opposite of when they refer to players as a "Premiership Player"
"Introducing 3-time wooden spooner.....Brendan Fevola!"
create a second league, with relegation.
Get rid of the Draft. and salary cap.
I think that will stop tanking and make the league more competitive from 3-16 (Adelaide and West Coast 1 and 2)
Watch audience numbers plummet = TV income slashed good bye billion dollars.
Sponsors will only be interested in sponsoring the big clubs that have the money to stay up = Only about 4 teams will win the premiership for the next 50 years.
Exciting young players will only go to clubs that can pay them the money = level of competition decreases thus viewer enjoyment decreases. No competition.
Your plan sounds good. If you want to kill the game.
The salary cap and drafting must stay the same for an equitible competition. West Coast are filthy rich, have virtually our whole stadium full of members and 15,000 odd in a queue waiting to become members. Not to many teams, if any, could compete against the Eagles in a free market competition.
I was out mate. Gave the Swans an extra spoon.
how doesn't make sense. If no salary cap and relegation/promotion is introduced, Carlton will not play at the venue they are forced to play in by the AFL and instead play at our very own venue where we dont need 30k to break even. Right now West Coast and Fremantle have the best deal with their stadium with subi... should salary cap / promotion/relegation be introduced, they will continue to pay the rent for subi... while we pay nothing for out ground... hence we make more... you understand now?Why?
That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. What on Earth are you trying to say?
Assuming rich friends last forever. John Elliot used to be rich.
So if my team was relegated, I would support someone else? Carlton? Why would I do that? No one I know would. Your fantasy land assumes that a whole lot of stars are going to align perfectly for just a few clubs. Your dream sounds like 1986.
An economics study? There was a reason the VFL was broke, you tool.
Adelaide, Freo and West Coast are the richest clubs in the country by a long way.
create a second league, with relegation.
Get rid of the Draft. and salary cap.
I think that will stop tanking and make the league more competitive from 3-16 (Adelaide and West Coast 1 and 2)
neither West Coast, Fremantle or Adeliade or Essendon own a football stadium that can hold a reasonable footy attendance
Should the league be no salary cap, no draft etc. then each club will need to own their own stadium, or rent one out. This is why Carlton would generate much much more money than those 4 teams.
Right now we have the worst deal with TD in which would mean where west coast generate x amount of money for 40k at subi, we make x/4 for the same attedance. If there is no salary cap, this would be turned on its head.
If there is no salary and we sit initially in a better position than most team, we can then upgrade OO even further to accomadate more people.
Plus we have one of the best sponsorship deal than most club (hawthorn and Collingwood) better than us. however if relegation/promotion is to come in, Hawthorn's major sponsor will be gone.
Above all that, we have rich supporters in which would mean we would be able to afford to pay our player the most. Dick Pratt (and his friends) alone would fund more than any other team combine can be able to fund.
And with promotion and relegation, the weaker teams will drop to lower level comp, allowing for an increase in support for the bigger club, and hence just on that alone, teams like Carlton, Collingwood and Essendon would only grow. And because initially we would be better of (again this is going back to stadium and rich people at the club), we would win more as we'd spend more on players and not paying ground hire... which would win us more games, more flags and hence more fans.
Enjoy the economic study boys and girls, the test in next week (closed book)
I'd like to see the opposite of when they refer to players as a "Premiership Player"
"Introducing 3-time wooden spooner.....Brendan Fevola!"