Geoffe_Miles
Team Captain
- Jun 15, 2010
- 496
- 0
- AFL Club
- West Coast
woosha isnt under more scrutiny because the players still play for him. a low winning record isnt what puts a coach under pressure, but rather how players respond to a coach. and its clear that players do respond to the coach whether people like that or not.
Exactly how is this "clear", Galileo? How do you back that up? I, and every other member, have seen many instances every week this year of downhill skiers in our team not chasing, not tackling, not running to provide an option, not shepherding for a team mate, not blocking, not passing off to a team mate in a better position. I have seen this every week, every single game i have been to. I have heard people like Robby Wiley, Langdon and Jako comment on the lack or effort and discipline from certain players in more or less every game they have commentated this year. And i have not once seen Worsfold drag, let alone drop any of them for an extended period.
This team is beaten before it even steps on the park because they don't care and the coach cuddles and kisses them after they put in poor displays and hangs everything on the youth excuse. But somehow you assert that "it's clear that the players respond to the coach". That doesn't square with what i and every other member have seen getting dished up by Worsfold's teams every other week at Subi.
Just because the players are not going to the board and agitating for Worsfold to get sacked, as they are with Knights at Essendon, doesn't mean that they are playing for him and putting in 100% effort for our club 100% of the time. How you can try an dargue that there is no concerns with lack or effort and desire when the club wins the spoon by th elength of the straight is mind boggling.