- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,345
People that give the greens any level of support whatsoever. Waste of space.
would you like to elaborate?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People that give the greens any level of support whatsoever. Waste of space.
We need more Bob Katter screaming out across the halls of parliament and standing up on issues that have nothing to do with his electorate.
He should have been PM, not that stupid redhead slag.
I plan on doing similar to this however I don't put the 2 big parties last, last spot is reserved for Family First, low spots on the Senate are reserved for FF, catholic party, socialist party etc..That's how I vote.
First greens, then independents, then the weirdos, then the 2 big parties last.
If everybody voted this way the big parties would get a wake up call.
Curious for your justification here? If a particular party has policies which align with your beliefs I fail to see how it is a waste of space. Frankly their policies hit almost bang on for me...People that give the greens any level of support whatsoever. Waste of space.
People that give the greens any level of support whatsoever. Waste of space.
I want a revolution where we cut heads off and stuff. When's that happening?
It's coming BALKAN, be patient.
Last night i had a dream that a revolution was coming. This guy from South Africa was rabble raising and yelled "when the std of living here drops 25 points (whatever the hell that means ) there's going to be riots and a revolution."
And i remembered thinking in my dream that it mean cutting peoples heads off and shit so it's weird that you asked.
Curious for your justification here? If a particular party has policies which align with your beliefs I fail to see how it is a waste of space. Frankly their policies hit almost bang on for me...
That attitude pisses me off to no end. The Greens represent me better than the 2 major parties; Labor has utterly betrayed and failed me, they do not represent me, but rather represent pandering to racist bogans. I couldn't bring myself to vote for them.
For me it's the greens or wikileaks or the sex party. The 2 majors can go fk themselves.
so... is this the wrong place to come and say that i have no idea how to vote?
Sounds like you do care man. And you're absolutely right, I wouldn't let Tones run a bath.I don't care who people vote for, I don't care about policies, but for the love of god, please, PLEASE, don't vote for Abbot. That guy is a ******* moron who should not be the manager of McDonalds, let alone our countries leader.
I don't care who people vote for, I don't care about policies, but for the love of god, please, PLEASE, don't vote for Abbot. That guy is a ******* moron who should not be the manager of McDonalds, let alone our countries leader.
Sounds like you do care man. And you're absolutely right, I wouldn't let Tones run a bath.
Unfortunately I think due to the utter incompetency of Julie and Kev along with their ongoing spats we are not going to see that happen. I won't be surprised though once Tony gets in if Malcolm doesn't pop up and challenge at the first whiff of discontent.
I'm not sure that I agree with the incompetency line. Gillard achieved more for Australia in three years than Howard did in ten. What's more she did this against the backdrop of a hung parliament, a largely hostile press, a relentlessly negative opposition and all with the world's biggest financial meltdown since the Great Depression going on in the background. This was not a perfect government by any stretch of the imagination, but in ten years time I think the positives of the Gillard government will be seen as far outweighing the negatives.Unfortunately I think due to the utter incompetency of Julie and Kev along with their ongoing spats we are not going to see that happen. I won't be surprised though once Tony gets in if Malcolm doesn't pop up and challenge at the first whiff of discontent.
I'm not sure that I agree with the incompetency line. Gillard achieved more for Australia in three years than Howard did in ten. What's more she did this against the backdrop of a hung parliament, a largely hostile press, a relentlessly negative opposition and all with the world's biggest financial meltdown since the Great Depression going on in the background. This was not a perfect government by any stretch of the imagination, but in ten years time I think the positives of the Gillard government will be seen as far outweighing the negatives.
Education reform, NBN, Disability Care, mental health reform, Carbon Pricing, welfare reform v. Two wars, school chaplains, flagpoles and a structural deficit.
I know which I prefer.
It's still fair superior to the rodent's record. Can you name national building projects stemming from his government?Which you've made clear with how selective you've been. There are still massive questions over how effective the NBN, education reform and the carbon tax have been/will be. The other examples you've listed are certainly worthwhile initiatives and very important in their own right. But in doing those things, she also managed to undermine the support of her own party enough to throw her out. Unfortunately, that's how she'll be remembered (fairly or unfairly).
Education reform, NBN, Disability Care, mental health reform, Carbon Pricing, welfare reform v. Two wars, school chaplains, flagpoles and a structural deficit.
I know which I prefer.
It's still fair superior to the rodent's record. Can you name national building projects stemming from his government?