Tigers, Kangas and Lions fans

Remove this Banner Ad

Tigers - Adam Treloar would never choose Richmond over Collingwood. He is ours because he wanted to play for us. He didn't even consider you.

Kangas- James Aish never wanted to play for you. Why would he? He chose us and you lost out again.

Lions- Yes we know you were going to send Aish to the draft. We know you wouldn't deal with us. We know you talk tough but talk is cheap. He is a Magpie.

Lions, Tigers and Kangas oh my. We are Collingwood. You are not. Enjoy.
 
Tigers - Adam Treloar would never choose Richmond over Collingwood. He is ours because he wanted to play for us. He didn't even consider you.

Kangas- James Aish never wanted to play for you. Why would he? He chose us and you lost out again.

Lions- Yes we know you were going to send Aish to the draft. We know you wouldn't deal with us. We know you talk tough but talk is cheap. He is a Magpie.

Lions, Tigers and Kangas oh my. We are Collingwood. You are not. Enjoy.
Thread needs more Carlton

They were getting all three with their #1 PSD pick.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

lions-and-tigers-and-bears-oh-my.jpg
 
Tigers - Adam Treloar would never choose Richmond over Collingwood. He is ours because he wanted to play for us. He didn't even consider you.
To be fair, he did consider the Tigers, just like Kevin Bartlett considered that sex change operation.
 
Tigers - Adam Treloar would never choose Richmond over Collingwood. He is ours because he wanted to play for us. He didn't even consider you.

Kangas- James Aish never wanted to play for you. Why would he? He chose us and you lost out again.

Lions- Yes we know you were going to send Aish to the draft. We know you wouldn't deal with us. We know you talk tough but talk is cheap. He is a Magpie.

Lions, Tigers and Kangas oh my. We are Collingwood. You are not. Enjoy.

i have fond memories of primary school...
 
I was just reading the AFL's analysis for all clubs. Evidently the ratings were done by Nathan Schmook.....unfortunate name for the lad. I'm sure he's had a difficult childhood.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-10-22/trade-period-the-final-verdict

Anyway, I dont really care what he rates our trading over the last two weeks but I honestly cant see how the hell he came up with the various ratings for each team. He gives Geelong an A+ based a lot on Dangerfield and then gives Adelaide a B- because they shouldnt be judged on losing Dangerfield....go figure... obviously logic isnt a prerequisite to be an AFL site "contributor". He even mentioned St. Kilda gaining the nod for Rice in the father-son. What has that got to do with trading?

The reality is the "ratings" will be reflected in the number of finals appearances in the next half dozen years, and the ridiculous inconsistent knee jerk assessments by some kid with a funny name will be forgotten by all but the Schmook and maybe his mother in the fullness of time.
 
TBH, I think the Tigers fans, although at one stage thanks to king troll KB, thought they were a chance of getting AT. Once reality kicked in and they knew they were dreaming, their comments went from stupid and sad to a bit tongue in cheek, actually entertaining at times.
Kangaroos fans, well really they are just harmless.
As for Brisbane fans, I think they may have had way to many knocks to the head playing rugby before they learnt about AFL to hold a valid opinion.
Some of them can make an interesting view point but the vast majority are just anti Eddie, anti Bucks, anti anything Collingwood, who really should wear a hat whilst outside, as they have burnt way to many brain cells from their time in the sun.
Actually, Brisbane in general should now be known as the gymnasts, for they do a great backflip:D
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A lot of tiges supporters saying theyre happy they didnt get treloar ... too expensive, wont fit in with cotch, deledio, martin etc. So delusional and bitter, but so awesome to read as a pies man.
 
Dont think Kangaroos fans would give a shit considering they walked out of the 3 way as the winner
 
A lot of tiges supporters saying theyre happy they didnt get treloar ... too expensive, wont fit in with cotch, deledio, martin etc. So delusional and bitter, but so awesome to read as a pies man.

No he wouldn't want to take all those possessions off Cotch come finals time.
 
Actually, Treloar did consider Richmond. He hints at it in the video we made. He said "it came down to 2 teams".

Naive ot think that other team wasn't Richmond.
I think I put it better though.
 
Actually, Treloar did consider Richmond. He hints at it in the video we made. He said "it came down to 2 teams".

Naive ot think that other team wasn't Richmond.

He was never going to Richmond. He has been coming to Collingwood since May.
 
He was never going to Richmond. He has been coming to Collingwood since May.

I'm aware it's realistically always been Collingwood, but he did say HIMSELF that it was down to 2 teams. He wouldn't say that in a Collingwood promotional video if it wasn't true.
 
Its good he considered Richmond, makes it even better to rub it in their face, we're entitled to it....we were in the same situation with Judd
 
The best part about it is both Richmond and North were in the market for some of the same players we were and still we fended them off as the players were hell bent on joining us- both those teams played finals too.

It speaks volumes of our drawing power once again as a club and what we are building with the people we have in charge.

As for Brisbane, it was just good to be able to return the favour from Beams last year.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Tigers, Kangas and Lions fans

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top