-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Recommitted Tim Kelly [requested a trade to West Coast]
- Thread starter Lore
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,827
- 54,134
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Did not understand that technicality, thanks for the explanation
- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,827
- 54,134
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I would expect they'd wait until the end of the season to put it on the table. Given the likelihood of rejection you'd rather not feed the media
Cats would need the AFL to approve as well. These new age rolling contracts with player options etc is getting more and more complicated.
Evolution of that part of the game and catching up with overseas sports.
- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,827
- 54,134
- AFL Club
- Geelong
The Lycett compo pick wasn't a first rounder, doesn't count for the 2 in 4 rule. That's why it was taken on day 2 of the draft. It wasn't made hugely clear at the time but I did spend a bit of time checking. Getting it to count for the 2 in 4 hurdle would've added a bit of value to the pick
- May 5, 2006
- 62,757
- 70,118
- AFL Club
- West Coast
You can spin this both ways. Footy journos looove rumour mongering and speculation. On the one hand, Kelly doesn't want to join Freo because of friction with the Hills. On the other, the Hills and Langdon being on the way out is a sign of player unrest so Kelly wouldn't want to join Freo.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,757
- 70,118
- AFL Club
- West Coast
2018 AFL draft - Wikipedia
Draft order has 22 and 23 as first round picks. Footywire has pick 23 as Rd 1 also. I mentioned the extra 'value' last year.
If need be the AFL would need to approve the Eagles using multiple 1st in trades.
Given it jusy won the premiership, has a very strong list and used 9 2nd round picks in two drafts the Eagles list planing is looking pretty solid.
The only reason the AFL would not allow it would be to restrict the Eagles getting too strong and force them to give up a player.
- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,827
- 54,134
- AFL Club
- Geelong
2018 AFL draft - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Draft order has 22 and 23 as first round picks. Footywire has pick 23 as Rd 1 also. I mentioned the extra 'value' last year.
Just checking we're answering the same question here:
"An end-of-first-round compensation selection does not count in a club's rolling four-year tally."
Trading first-round picks: Misunderstood rule explained
Marc McGowan cuts through the confusion around a complex rule
m.afl.com.au
- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,827
- 54,134
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Wouldn't rule it out but yeah I agree that the pick would've carried a lot more value had it been the case
I have no doubt the AFL will sign off on West Coast trading away this and next year's first rounder for Kelly. They play the child with additional needs, restraint of trade, do a sneaky via the supplemental draft, mental health card, etc and we'd be home and hosed.
Just checking we're answering the same question here:
"An end-of-first-round compensation selection does not count in a club's rolling four-year tally."
Trading first-round picks: Misunderstood rule explained
Marc McGowan cuts through the confusion around a complex rule
View attachment 715484
No arguments from me.
I was just saying should the Eagles require permission to use two 1st they should be ok getting that.
The AFL put in this rule to protect clubs from themselves and burning future picks. Given the Eagles exchanged a future 1st with Gold Coast for multiple 2nd rounders and smashed the draft with 9 2nd round selections in two drafts, won a flag and have a quality list, they are doing pretty well IMO on list management.
If however the AFL want to use that rule to equalise the competition and block the Eagles building a better list well thats a different scenario. So I wouldnt be surprised if they said no with a BS excuse.
Would be especially bad if we started sniffing around Coniglio as a FA.
Suddenly it would be all 'integrity of the competition' or some such crap. Probably end up with a Sydney like trade ban.
- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,827
- 54,134
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Won't argue that if anyone should have the rule waived it should be west coast but you have to acknowledge the default position would be to stick to the rules
Agreed but the rules allow for a waiver under certain circumstances that only the AFL knows. But when a club tradrs a 1st round pick for multiple 2nd rounders that equate to much more draft currency and they use that drafting kids asking for a waiver isnt asking a lot.
Especially with the 1st round pick we traded we dropped 3 spots 18 to 21 plus gained two other 2nd rounders.
If WCE get pick 19 from GC plus our pick 16 at the moment ...then # 16 and #19 to Geelong might be a chance which is pretty good for Geelong on a player that's wants to come home and is uncontracted . Sounds about even ...
I was thinking the same thing, that happened last year
Read somewhere we might swap pick 22 (Sydney's) + Brendan AhChee for GC pick 19 .....anyway it's a chance .
Brendon ah chee?... lol you d be paying gc to take him off you .
Anyway good chance his brother won’t even be there next year
Peel67skin
Norm Smith Medallist
- May 21, 2017
- 8,387
- 3,941
- AFL Club
- Gold Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
- Banned
- #3,950
Lol Brendan ah chee worth nothing.
- Status
Similar threads
