Speculation Tom Barrass [UFA 2027] - Reportedly headed to Hawthorn

Remove this Banner Ad

He's better than any KPD Hawthorn currently has.

He is only as good as a 5 foot uncontracted midget from the Tigers and that's all he is worth.
 
Let it go mate, don't cry over spilt milk. Eagles fans should take the weekend off and breath.

You can still win

Haw: Barrass, 26 ( give - 33, F1(Haw), F2(Carl))
WC: Baker, 20, 51, F3 (give Barass, 26)
GC: Rioli, F1(Haw), F2(Carl) ( give - 6,13)
Rich: 6, 13, 33 ( Give - Rioli, Baker, 20, 51, F3)
In what world are baker and rioli worth more than barass? West Coast have every right to say where to go if noble and rioli are worth first or multiple firsts. Barass is a premiership key back, not a flanker. Anyone would think rioli is Andrew mcleod and noble is Corey enright and baker is Peter matera
 

Log in to remove this ad.

In what world are baker and rioli worth more than barass? West Coast have every right to say where to go if noble and rioli are worth first or multiple firsts. Barass is a premiership key back, not a flanker. Anyone would think rioli is Andrew mcleod and noble is Corey enright and baker is Peter matera
Logic like that has no place in this thread mate
 
In what world are baker and rioli worth more than barass? West Coast have every right to say where to go if noble and rioli are worth first or multiple firsts. Barass is a premiership key back, not a flanker. Anyone would think rioli is Andrew mcleod and noble is Corey enright and baker is Peter matera
In this world Rioli is worth 2 x Barrass

Something is worth what the market pays
 
Barrass wouldve been a RFA, so there wouldve been more of a market for him as he would cost 0 trade capital.
Clubs would pay over 1mil for the 5 years for him, look at what plebs like Perryman and Battle are getting paid.
Easily band 1 for Barrass if he was a free agent
We wouldnt let him go for less than band1.
 
Has any FA moved under free agency of Barrass' calibre?
Plenty but which 29 year old free agent has attracted a Band 1
Age is a major factor in the compo pick mate as well as salary and length of contract

4 year deal for a 29 year old at $900k does not get a band 1 compo even if he was alex rance
 
Barrass wouldve been a RFA, so there wouldve been more of a market for him as he would cost 0 trade capital.
Clubs would pay over 1mil for the 5 years for him, look at what plebs like Perryman and Battle are getting paid.
Easily band 1 for Barrass if he was a free agent
We wouldnt let him go for less than band1.
Why would he have been a RFA ?
isnt there a rule that says 10 years is a FA ? Genuine question
 
Barrass wouldve been a RFA, so there wouldve been more of a market for him as he would cost 0 trade capital.
Clubs would pay over 1mil for the 5 years for him, look at what plebs like Perryman and Battle are getting paid.
Easily band 1 for Barrass if he was a free agent
We wouldnt let him go for less than band1.
WCE were stupid not having any FA coming out of contract while they bottomed, could have had multiple extra top three picks the last few years (Yeo, Kelly, Barrass), and next year (Allen), while moving out the dead wood.
 
Why would he have been a RFA ?
isnt there a rule that says 10 years is a FA ? Genuine question

Let Stallon go he wants his Band 1 for a 29 year old cripple.
 
ah maybe, regardless wouldve been many clubs after him. Easily on over 1mil per season over 5 years
Just checked
"all ten-year players are Unrestricted Free Agents"

So as a 29 year old there would be no chance he would have got band 1 , Band 2 yes
and he would have just got a 4 year deal so the length and age would have been the decider
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If they told Barrass to find a new home, an Barrass and his manager feel the Hawks offered fair compensation…. Those involved may see it differently!

* Given Barrass B&F speech I feel the eagles told him to go look for another club ( just reading the play, I could be wrong)

Alternately Barrass was assured by Hawthorn that they had the draft capital to get the deal done.
Tommy believed that is was a done deal after WC told him they would work with Hawks and see if the could get a deal done, hence his acceptance speech.

Hawks were firm on what they would offer, Eagles firm on what they would accept, the two assessments didn't align.

Thats trading sometimes the ducks line up, however they didn't do so this time.

Both Clubs move on, no hard feelings.
 
Last edited:
Just checked
"all ten-year players are Unrestricted Free Agents"

So as a 29 year old there would be no chance he would have got band 1 , Band 2 yes
and he would have just got a 4 year deal so the length and age would have been the decider
Why?
 
Just checked
"all ten-year players are Unrestricted Free Agents"

So as a 29 year old there would be no chance he would have got band 1 , Band 2 yes
and he would have just got a 4 year deal so the length and age would have been the decider
Not sure if you realise barass is contracted to 2027. Second in the league in intercept marks and top 5 key defenders in the league at 28 he's got plenty in the tank
 
In what world are baker and rioli worth more than barass? West Coast have every right to say where to go if noble and rioli are worth first or multiple firsts. Barass is a premiership key back, not a flanker. Anyone would think rioli is Andrew mcleod and noble is Corey enright and baker is Peter matera

Here comes the joker trying to burn it all up.. LMAO.
Pls preach this to Tigers fans.. only going by what they say was on table.

As per them Suns offerred Pick 6 for Rioli(some Sal paid), 10 & 18 for Bolton.

Baker's value was unclear but most tiger fans thought they can snag him with a swap of pick 14 for 24. I rate him around pick 20ish.

Barrass for F1(Haw) & F2(Carl) is the deal on table satisfying Matty Clarke's demand for 1st and 2nd round pick.

Up to Eagles how they deal with Tigers for Baker. Not my drama. Maybe F1(Haw) with something coming back would satisfy the tigers, maybe not.
 
Barrass wouldve been a RFA, so there wouldve been more of a market for him as he would cost 0 trade capital.
Clubs would pay over 1mil for the 5 years for him, look at what plebs like Perryman and Battle are getting paid.
Easily band 1 for Barrass if he was a free agent
We wouldnt let him go for less than band1.

Are we offering him a 5 year deal?
 
Not sure if you realise barass is contracted to 2027. Second in the league in intercept marks and top 5 key defenders in the league at 28 he's got plenty in the tank
The discussion was about if he was a free agent he would attract a band 1 compo
As a 29 year old free agent that would have been unlikely
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Speculation Tom Barrass [UFA 2027] - Reportedly headed to Hawthorn

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top