I like your thinkingKeep in mind we will only have pick 18 to bargain with if we need to trade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I like your thinkingKeep in mind we will only have pick 18 to bargain with if we need to trade.
Don't worry about the pies, we've got to get past #lolnorf and their war chest first...Have we got the all clear from Collingwood to be even entertaining the thought? They have first dibs on every one don't they?
I reckon if the Club want Lynch those hard calls have already been put into motion...
As good as signed. Had a Josh Caddy poster on his bedroom wall as a kid.
Not at the Lambert/Marcon level.are they verified besties , lots of shared insta likes et al , i want proof
100% go all out to get him...
whats the mandatory delistings per year, 5 or so...
So from this year we had the following leave the list (some conservative numbers there):
Batch - $125k
Elton - $125k
Hunt - $125k
Lennon - $300k
Maric - $150k
Morris - $125k
Yarran - $400k
Lids $ - $250k
Thats $1.6m out, all replaced by kids (7) on the average of $85k is $595k, so saving of a tick over $1 mil.
So say we have a few more movements, Hampson goes say $350k plus someone like Miles or Lloyd also goes (another $150k) replaced by kids, theres another $300k or close to it...
So we could easily free up or even front load a T Lynch contract
Don't worry about the pies, we've got to get past #lolnorf and their war chest first...
We don't have 5 senior players to cut and who's gonna retire? We've got a young list.I think we could have a large amount of salary cap space; enough to after Lynch. Here's my fairly simplistic reasoning (lots of guesswork involved!):
- 5 senior players cut + 3 retirements [+$2m-ish]
- No senior acquisitions this year. Replaced with draftees and upgraded rookies [-$1m-ish]
- I believe we were subsidising Lids' wage at GWS in 2017, but that is now over [not 100% sure on this one]
- Salary cap has been raised 20% this year. Not sure what measures have been put into place to ensure this is spread across all players but surely this is going to have a similar effect to what COLA had [+$2.08m]
- I've been lucky enough speak to Dan Richardson and a few other Richmond people about the mechanics of the salary cap in the past. Richmond have had a policy of not financially rewarding mediocrity. For that reason, we tried to stay around the floor (95% of the cap). Everyone was aware that it would increase significantly if we had a period of sustained success, as an additional incentive. We are now the best team in the comp and so we can justify pushing closer to the salary cap [+$500k]
So there's potentially $3.5m p/a of space there.
I think we'd be mad not to go after Lynch if we can get him as a free agent at a reasonable price.
Pulling the pin on the Schache trade late in the piece, and showing no interest in Stringer who sounded us out or Devon Smith who we had pursued in the past and apparently was also keen on Richmond.What are those hard calls? Trading a 30-year old Jack R away (Hawthorne-style) to free up a position and cap space?
Hampson, Griffiths, Lloyd, Conca, Miles (if it means we can get Lynch).We don't have 5 senior players to cut and who's gonna retire? We've got a young list.
You'd be surprised. Do some rough sums... it adds up!We don't pay those players much anyway
Hammer is a 10 year player 400 kYou'd be surprised. Do some rough sums... it adds up!