- Banned
- #326
If Lance's last name had been Legstrong I don't think he would have needed all those drugs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
His name should have been Headstrong.If Lance's last name had been Legstrong I don't think he would have needed all those drugs
Who really cares, Armstrong is crap and I hope they change their mind, would have rather saved a spot for a late smokie in the DRAFT
That's gold.yeh he chose Russell, Corrie and lynch hasn't been convincing
Not to mention spuds like Pendlebury, Sidebottom and Beams!yeh he chose Russell, Corrie and lynch hasn't been convincing
yeh he chose Russell, Corrie and lynch hasn't been convincing
And recruiters usually nails those 5th round pick types.
not yetSo is this bloke at collingwood yet or not?
... Why?not yet
"likely in psd"... Why?
So is this bloke at collingwood yet or not?
If Armstrong is rookied, and I'm assuming he's a willing participant as he probably doesn't have too many options, does this mean that #67 becomes a live pick again instead of an Oxley/Dwyer elevation pick?
If Armstrong is rookied, and I'm assuming he's a willing participant as he probably doesn't have too many options, does this mean that #67 becomes a live pick again instead of an Oxley/Dwyer elevation pick?
Correct. If Armstrong was to be rookied, we would have the option of a delisted free agent, live pick 67 or pre season draft selection i.e one more spot on our list to fill.I think we have 35 senior players at the moment and will take that to 38, obviously 6 and 10 take us to 37 which means either we take a player in the PSD or use 67 on a hine special.
That is assuming Gault stays on the senior list which I hope doesn't happen
Nope. Looking like now that he could come in the Rookie Draft
TD just being competitive as he missed out on White & Adams. No harm done.Is it fair to say you were yet again a little premature in putting up yet another Welcome To Collingwood thread therefore, Dave?
Maybe a learning for next year is to wait until a player is officially a Collingwood player before putting an Official Welcome to Collingwood thread up...
Is it fair to say you were yet again a little premature in putting up yet another Welcome To Collingwood thread therefore, Dave?
Maybe a learning for next year is to wait until a player is officially a Collingwood player before putting an Official Welcome to Collingwood thread up...
Yes I went a bit early. Though the Article sounded like it was a Certintaty so I posted it like that.
Mods have not closed it and Mods Have Changed the Thread Title a Little Bit
Maybe a learning for next year is to only post it when the club announces it...
I prefer: 'Tony Armstrong heavily linked to Collingwood via delisted free agency or pre season draft or rookie draft, however not yet 100% confirmed but looking likely to be welcomed to Collingwood very very soon if not sooner'What would be better. Something Like:
Tony Armstrong Heavily Linked to Collinwood
What would be better. Something Like:
Tony Armstrong Heavily Linked to Collinwood