- Aug 3, 2020
- 21,281
- 36,378
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics, Liverpool
None of whom were drafted in the last 10 yearsMartyn, Cotchin, Rance, Kennedy, Gaff
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
None of whom were drafted in the last 10 yearsMartyn, Cotchin, Rance, Kennedy, Gaff
None of whom were drafted in the last 10 years
we would need to finish last otherwise we get no benefit finishing second last and so on.Well he ain't wrong, our list is a mess and now we're finishing in the bottom 2 and have traded out our 1st and 2nd round picks...
None of whom were drafted in the last 10 years
Martyn, Cotchin, Rance, Kennedy, Gaff
Yes, could go down as one of our greatest drafts (time will tell).Isn’t the counter argument if we don’t finish bottom three, our first rounder gets absorbed by Daicos, and we have to draft from a weaker draft instead of having Poulter etc.
We probably should have sniffed that we were a bottom four side, but to be honest I’m very happy with our draft last year. About 6-7 could be senior players which is amazing.
Its interesting but meaningless.Truth is most of the stats the AFL uses are meaningless.That is an amazing stat that got me thinking.... How many top 5 picks in the past ten years have become premiership players... All I can come up with is Boyd Bontempelli and Stringer...
Sold!!GWS need a ruckman... Riccardi for Lynch - straight swap.
Both have shown they have potential in their respective positions, both can't get a game in their respective sides. Win-win trade for me.
Lynch for the 1st rounder we gave them and RiccardiGWS need a ruckman... Riccardi for Lynch - straight swap.
Both have shown they have potential in their respective positions, both can't get a game in their respective sides. Win-win trade for me.
The AFL has a lot of growing up to do in that regard. It's supposedly a professional sport yet we get so precious about trading players. Then there is the farcical not openly disclosing salaries. It's amateur hour.It's time they let clubs trade players on draft night. It annoys me that we can't match a Daicos bid and THEN trade a player for a first or second round pick.
Currently we'd have to trade a player for a future pick, match a bid and then try and trade that future pick back into the draft. Guaranteed to be burned.
Can't let Lynch go IMO.GWS need a ruckman... Riccardi for Lynch - straight swap.
Both have shown they have potential in their respective positions, both can't get a game in their respective sides. Win-win trade for me.
Pointless.Given i don't understand how the draft works exactly. What would it take to get another one or two top 10 picks.
Trading Sidebottom, Elliot and Lynch perhaps?
Is that possible?
GWS need a ruckman... Riccardi for Lynch - straight swap.
Both have shown they have potential in their respective positions, both can't get a game in their respective sides. Win-win trade for me.
FM, if we extend JTAn extension to his house after hes delisted this year?
The only problem here would be the draft would go all night if your trading players and what about requiring players agreement to the trade??It's time they let clubs trade players on draft night. It annoys me that we can't match a Daicos bid and THEN trade a player for a first or second round pick.
Currently we'd have to trade a player for a future pick, match a bid and then try and trade that future pick back into the draft. Guaranteed to be burned.
I would be very surrised if Thomas doesnt get another 1 year contract. he has had a fairly good season and we lack experience. We cant play kids all the time, will just get smashed, need a balanceFM, if we extend JT
The only problem here would be the draft would go all night if your trading players and what about requiring players agreement to the trade??
Yeah that’s the reason I think also, we do need experience players...but my take on JT is keeping someone like Ginnivan out of the side and stifling his development. I would hope our new coach will have a more hardline approach on our senior players that constantly under perform...I would be very surrised if Thomas doesnt get another 1 year contract. he has had a fairly good season and we lack experience. We cant play kids all the time, will just get smashed, need a balance
I would be very surrised if Thomas doesnt get another 1 year contract. he has had a fairly good season and we lack experience. We cant play kids all the time, will just get smashed, need a balance
I think what it always should be is that the guys coming up have to displace the incumbants by superior performance. Gifting games never helps. Equation is pretty simple. Ginnivan gets games when he outperforms guys like Thomas. Its not a massive ask but also not fait accompli. If Ginnivan doesnt go past Thomas his development isnt being stifled.Yeah that’s the reason I think also, we do need experience players...but my take on JT is keeping someone like Ginnivan out of the side and stifling his development. I would hope our new coach will have a more hardline approach on our senior players that constantly under perform...
The AFL has a lot of growing up to do in that regard. It's supposedly a professional sport yet we get so precious about trading players. Then there is the farcical not openly disclosing salaries. It's amateur hour.
FM, if we extend JT
The only problem here would be the draft would go all night if your trading players and what about requiring players agreement to the trade??