Strategy Trade and List .Management thread 5 (...the post coitus cigarette. Edition)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I do think Stringer was more important to the premiership than he got credit for though Pann. Our mids/general structure make it hard for our forwards to score sometimes and there have been a number of games where flashy goals out of nowhere have been very important in helping us lift and get over the line. My concern is that without him there is very little in the way of spark in that forward line.

I certainly hope I'm wrong, but I look at a potential forward six next year and shudder.
He was vital in the Semi (even though he was gifted one or two goals) but his output wasn’t great in the other finals. However I do agree that because of his danger, speed and strength, he took a key defender away from other players which helped everyone perform.

Our midfield is our whole game - the pressure it puts on around the ball gives the mids space to get the ball in to the forwards so it can be locked in.

Its pressure also protects our defenders; high balls under pressure we’re eaten up by our defensive backs for 2 years, but no pressure at the source this year resulted in our backs looking all at sea. Our personnel at either end are important, but not nearly as important as our personnel through the middle.

Bringing in players is obviously important to improve the squad, but improving the application, effort and mindset of our midfield and, by extension, the playing group, is 10 times more important.

Make no mistake, we are a premiership threat every year providing we maintain the rage we saw last year.
 
He was vital in the Semi (even though he was gifted one or two goals) but his output wasn’t great in the other finals. However I do agree that because of his danger, speed and strength, he took a key defender away from other players which helped everyone perform.

Our midfield is our whole game - the pressure it puts on around the ball gives the mids space to get the ball in to the forwards so it can be locked in.

Its pressure also protects our defenders; high balls under pressure we’re eaten up by our defensive backs for 2 years, but no pressure at the source this year resulted in our backs looking all at sea. Our personnel at either end are important, but not nearly as important as our personnel through the middle.

Bringing in players is obviously important to improve the squad, but improving the application, effort and mindset of our midfield and, by extension, the playing group, is 10 times more important.

Make no mistake, we are a premiership threat every year providing we maintain the rage we saw last year.
This manic pressure is a huge factor in why the Tiges are playing in a prelim on Saturday IMO
 
What we need are some STRONG leaders in our leadership group who can pull a wilful character like Jake into line. Dale, Easton, Bont, are just too nice. Imagine Jake explaining to Joel Selwood why he only laid one tackle :eek:.

We need a Captain like Rick Kennedy was, if you acted up like and didn't play the team line you got the crap beaten out of you as a lesson.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Who'd have thought Barrett having a crack at us
Why does this prick have it in for us, seriously he couldn't talk down stringers trade value more if he tried, it really is morally unfair, he is entitled to his opinion but he is hate bashing our club and I for one can't stand someone that is attacking the very fabric of what our club stands for
 
What did he say this time?
Insinuated that the club has handled the whole Stringer thing badly. Took a couple of swipes at Bev. One for not telling Jake that there was an issue at the exit meeting then not telling him he was up for trade. Also had a ping at him for coming out in the press and telling the footy world he was up for trade.
He hinted that Bevo's actions have valued Jake's trade value down.
That the club want to control where Jake is going. Barrett has basically said Jake is nominating Geelong.
 
We havent made a meal out of it thus far. Only real assessment can be made after the trade is done. I think we are passed the stage of getting a good trade for him but we still could retain him and turn him around to our benefit.

Obviously getting unders for a contracted star would be a disgraceful result though and one that simply must not happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top