- Sep 27, 2005
- 15,945
- 25,266
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Footscray
I don’t think he was a barrister!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
That doesn't matter, he can become one then. I just want him to stare down Morris...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t think he was a barrister!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
he 1st and F
I think his name was written on the board with a permanent marker. Nothing anyone can do.We say that but its is clear as day that Vanders will always play if fit, form be damned.
Agree with this, no significant difference between he and Dale and I don’t think it’s a good use of resources to have big money tied up in two half back distributors when we get good enough output out of a cheap as chips Bramble.
Houston is great but it would cost too much for what we'd be getting. He's an upgrade on Dale, much more well rounded a player but wouldnt make a huge difference to us I think
The Gallagher family are great people and Harvey loves the club and is absolutely committed to being the best footballer he can be. I'm hoping he can come on even further next year, great kid, great attitude, doesn't stuff up as this is so important to him. He is the type of youngster the coaches love.Garcia is an absolute must keep with Macrae, Smith & Daniel all essentially playing the same position.
Harmes actually becomes pretty important next year as depth. Hopefully Gallagher kicks along with all these guys adequately filling those 5th-7th midfield/half forward type roles. Sanders is another one too.
Dale is pretty good…..Houston is great but it would cost too much for what we'd be getting. He's an upgrade on Dale, much more well rounded a player but wouldnt make a huge difference to us I think
I don’t think he was a barrister!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Barrister not baristaNo, he doesn’t make coffee.
We took 2: Sanders and Judas. But that's only because during the 2016-2023 period our deficiencies were in key position stocks while we had a plethora of midfielders.The draft capital is the big one for me.
We’ve drafted 1 first round mid since Dunkley in 2015, will need to work our way up to the higher end this year with the Smith trade or pick swaps, so spending it on a mid sized 28 year old defender is a massive head scratcher.
Barrister not barista
Should make that 3 with Richards becoming a mid.We took 2: Sanders and Smith. But that's only because during the 2016-2023 period our deficiencies were in key position stocks while we had a plethora of midfielders.
I got it.