Strategy Trade and List Management Thread Part 7 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

[adogsfan5]

Absolute plethora of delicious mids in the top 15. I’d love to get in there.

 

[VitalDread]

 

[Ash1337]

Can now focus on Butters.

 

[TiAn_]

Can now focus on Butters.

Until he signs a long-term extension next year.

 

[yebach]

LDU

 

[Bonty4]

LDU

No thanks

 

[Doggies7]

Tom Emmett de-listed from Fremantle also, a strong, hard tackling pressure fwd. Does a lot of the 1%ers and a decent short burst runner. Doesn't get much of the footy nor kick too many goals which is his main issue, but more a pure pressure fwd.

 

[dogsuperfan]

No thanks

What’s wrong with LDU?

 

[Dogs 13]

No thanks

That’s LDU not UDL
So you don’t watch a lot of footy I take it.

 

[Bald Headed Flog]

Tom Emmett de-listed from Fremantle also, a strong, hard tackling pressure fwd. Does a lot of the 1%ers and a decent short burst runner. Doesn't get much of the footy nor kick too many goals which is his main issue, but more a pure pressure fwd.

Did you just describe Emmett or Vandermeer

 

[Ash1337]

Tom Emmett de-listed from Fremantle also, a strong, hard tackling pressure fwd. Does a lot of the 1%ers and a decent short burst runner. Doesn't get much of the footy nor kick too many goals which is his main issue, but more a pure pressure fwd.

Was watching him. He's another pushed out the amount of players they have in the same role. Forward/wing and was a mature pick up. He's 1 you'd have to list on to train to ascertain his abilities because Freo's gameplan is to get it from backline to forward in as few as possessions possible.

 

[Doggies7]

Did you just describe Emmett or Vandermeer

They do describe similarly but I feel they are pretty different. Vanders more the speedster opening up space down field and chasing runners, Emmett more the type to crunch players or lay some hard tackles and smothers helping to lock the ball in. Not sure he kicks enough goals or gets enough of the ball to use a list spot, but he's one we might look at

 

[Hoges64]

Tom Emmett de-listed from Fremantle also, a strong, hard tackling pressure fwd. Does a lot of the 1%ers and a decent short burst runner. Doesn't get much of the footy nor kick too many goals which is his main issue, but more a pure pressure fwd.

If we even invite him as a train-on player I will be resigning my membership.

He may be the worst player on an AFL list. Well, I guess he's not any more, but you get my drift.

Absolutely ****ing woeful.

 

[DueWest]

LDU

No thanks he isn’t even the best player in the worst team in the last 50 years

 

[Charlie Bucket]

Absolute plethora of delicious mids in the top 15. I’d love to get in there.

Trade in next years 1st for one of Richmond’s picks. 10/11 maybe. Although might be too late to get one of the high end mids.

 

[Doggies7]

If we even invite him as a train-on player I will be resigning my membership.

He may be the worst player on an AFL list. Well, I guess he's not any more, but you get my drift.

Absolutely ****ing woeful.

Hahaha that might be the most outrageous threatening of a membership i've ever heard. Cancelling it, if we invite Tom Emmett to our pre-season to try out for a rookie list spot...

 

[DannyB4]

Trade in next years 1st for one of Richmond’s picks. 10/11 maybe. Although might be too late to get one of the high end mids.

Terrible idea. Then we end up in the same position next year without a 1st round pick and Butters to potentially be available.

 

[threenewpadlocks]

Terrible idea. Then we end up in the same position next year without a 1st round pick and Butters to potentially be available.

Yep, if anything, we should be doing the opposite.

Trading out our current pick 17 in the hope that some other team trades their future first because they over-value the 'available' player, gives us a chance at having a top 10 pick next year even with a successful future that means we can plan for the greater number of out-of-contract players year.