Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Powell-Pepper has a good ball drop, he just struggles with the depth of his kicks and decision making, which are both quite fixable. His kicking woes have been overstated.Kicking can be fixed. Look at Powell-Pepper, you would think he was the worst kick the way he was talked about.
It still seems insane to me that anyone would ever play him at half-back.Powell-Pepper has a good ball drop, he just struggles with the depth of his kicks and decision making, which are both quite fixable. His kicking woes have been overstated.
Ha. Oops. Sorry
I still think Myers has a lot to offer. best footy ahead of him and could be a gun for a solid 4 or so more years
Did they have their phantom draft in this publication?Inside Football magazine has all disposal efficiency numbers with some interesting results. I don't think it's a true reflection on which players use the ball best but McGrath has the highest disposal efficiency out of any TAC player with Kerr having the worst ill make a list of the top 10 and bottom 10 later
They've gone so soft on predicting things they only have a "who they are looking at" section. Don't even put the usual "draft range" on player profiles.Did they have their phantom draft in this publication?
Nah just a summary of what players each club would go for, he will be doing his on Phantom closer to the draftDid they have their phantom draft in this publication?
Given the depth and overall evenness of this draft that's not really a surprise imo. Difficult to predict who goes where, all you can do is look at what each team might need and then guess.They've gone so soft on predicting things they only have a "who they are looking at" section. Don't even put the usual "draft range" on player profiles.
BooThey've gone so soft on predicting things they only have a "who they are looking at" section. Don't even put the usual "draft range" on player profiles.
Nice little video from a few years back showing a few highlights of Myers in his draft year, injuries have really done a number on his speed but always had the big hoof
They should have a crack.Given the depth and overall evenness of this draft that's not really a surprise imo. Difficult to predict who goes where, all you can do is look at what each team might need and then guess.
Not saying they shouldn't, just that this is a particularly difficult draft to predict. I don't think there will be a single club coming out of this draft that isn't pleased with their respective hauls aside from Hawthorn (who don't currently enter the draft until Pick 88) and Melbourne (who's first pick is currently Pick 47, but that could fall outside the top 50 once academy and father-son bidding is complete).They should have a crack.
Trouble is "experts" piecing together all the inside word and doing a phantom just before the draft and everyone remarking how accurate it was. Now nobody wants to be the guy who got ut wrong, so we have lost a fair amount of intel on how the draft shapes and the way player ratings chop & change.
They should have a crack.
Trouble is "experts" piecing together all the inside word and doing a phantom just before the draft and everyone remarking how accurate it was. Now nobody wants to be the guy who got ut wrong, so we have lost a fair amount of intel on how the draft shapes and the way player ratings chop & change.
FootyProphet said:Despite receiving a solid second round selection (pick 29) for Michael Hibberd, the Bombers will be looking to fill the void of this damaging backman. As a consequence, it appears likely that Essendon will be intent on drafting a backman who can break the lines – particularly with efficient disposal like Hibberd.
The Bombers have some quality key position players returning in Hurley and Hooker, but would be content in strengthening its stocks in this area. Their two age pick-ups last season were a success, with Mitch Brown and Michael Hartley both showing positive signs throughout season 2016, so a young KPP would help compliment their book-ends for the future.
Another facet the Bombers may look to bolster is their outside run, already possessing a quality inside midfield featuring Watson, Heppell, Merrett and the emerging Darcy Parish. Their outside midfielders in Brendon Goddard, David Zaharakis and Brent Stanton are aging, and while Colyer and Howlett will provide pace, a quality young speedster could add a lot to a progressing Essendon list.
Fill the void of Hibberd...yup that's why we're upgrading Walla and McKenna.http://footyprophet.com/2016-draft-preview-essendon/
Source: Footy Prophet.
Such a good laugh, those needs.
Howlett, a known outside runner.
Things we need: HBFs.....
Whoever wrote that simply wants to invent reasons to say why we'll choose McGrath.Fill the void of Hibberd...yup that's why we're upgrading Walla and McKenna.
Zaharakis aging? He's only 27 next year lol.
Howlett...pace? Umm...no.
Whoever wrote that clearly has no understanding of our list.
Things we need: HBFs
Agree. It's not a major need but we could do with one.We do, though not desperately. Specifically attacking HBF's. Goddard, Kelly probably only one year left, Baguley two. Gleeson, Mckenna and Dea might be AFL quality but doubt any will reach an elite level. Jury obviously still out on Morgan.
Pretty much, attempting to justify a picking a player we don't really need (as good as he is) by making stuff up. It doesn't take a genius to see we've got more than adequate replacements for Hibberd already and that Howlett isn't a quick player, he's a plodder.Whoever wrote that simply wants to invent reasons to say why we'll choose McGrath.
I like it. SPP unavailable at 20?Fellas, we've conducted a phantom draft over on our board(feel free to go have a look) and i was selecting for your mob, i ended up with
1: Mcluggage
20: Bolton
29: Scharenberg
41: Ridley
just curious about thoughts/comments on that haul?
Actually went at 21, personally didn't see bolton being there at 20 but if he was gone SPP it would have been. Reckon he's a better fit over Bolton?I like it. SPP unavailable at 20?