Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
It's fairly confusing to me that Port are being lauded so much in the media. They brought in 4 players from teams that didn't make finals, 3 of which were not best 23 locks in their previous teams and the 1 that was, won the reverse Coleman, all the while completely destroying their draft hand and losing a clearly talented first round pick from a very strong draft.
Props for getting it all done, but it was definitely overboard IMO. Had they kept the draft capital with not getting one of Soldo/Sweet and BZT, I'd think their period was pretty good.
I agree with that. While this years draft is shallow so its not a big deal to have no picks in they have given up a lot in picks and salary for guys who are essentially fringe players. I think they felt they had to do it given lycett is cooked they clearly think hayes is a spud clurey is out of favour and mckenzie is cooked. But i would have waited until next year when the market will have better quality rucks and kpds-they have paid a lot for guys who arent good enough to take them to a flag.
Im also not a big fan of what the pies did-yes schultz is good but small fwds are the easiest type to find in cheap trades. I can see them sliding next year so i wouldnt have given up a good r1 for him. Given their issues with tall stocks-cox and howe are very old, cameron is a C grader, frampton is one of the worst spuds to ever win a flag, kreuger is made of glass and murphy probably retires and kelly hasnt come on. I felt they didnt address their actual needs and shouldnt have spent a high pick unless it was on a good tall.
I like what sydney did-jury is out on if grundy can get back to his best but at least they addressed specific needs. Also dont mind freos trades as i rate next years pool.