Transfer discussion thread

[Memphis]

again, thats a shame

you see what im getting at.
3 years on kane's contract. Its on city to make it work if they want him so bad.

Would it be fair to say Levy would be stupid to turn down 150 mil for Kane?

 

[RPCB]

Would it be fair to say Levy would be stupid to turn down 150 mil for Kane?

Lets hope so.

 

[Zidane98]

That's why you went with a throwaway Leeds meme post - usually attracts them like flies to sh*t.

Next time eh?

What meme are you talking about? You are looking too much into things.

 

[citizen-erased]

Would it be fair to say Levy would be stupid to turn down 150 mil for Kane?

Who do you get, capable of scoring the way he does this season, for 150m to replace him?

I'd say you're stupid for accepting 150m and end up having to over pay for lesser players when you no longer have a striker

 

[Marcel Proust]

Lets hope so.

Grealish. Kane. Sterling

Foden. Rodri. Kdb.

 

[RPCB]

Grealish. Kane. Sterling

Foden. Rodri. Kdb.

Frightening.

Hopefully Levy is as stubborn and rich as we think he is.

 

[Zidane98]

Who do you get, capable of scoring the way he does this season, for 150m to replace him?

I'd say you're stupid for accepting 150m and end up having to over pay for lesser players when you no longer have a striker

Do you think Levy turns down 150m +? Seems unlikely. You could bring Vlhaovic & Lautaro for that much and then some. Harry Kanie is in his late 20s after all and doesnt have the greatest of injury records. As said in the other thread I would push for £100m + Laporte if I were Levy.

 

[Marcel Proust]

Frightening.

Hopefully Levy is as stubborn and rich as we think he is.

Back 5 isn't terrible either

 

[RossFC]

All done. Won't play this weekend though. Welcome back.

 

[Memphis]

Who do you get, capable of scoring the way he does this season, for 150m to replace him?

I'd say you're stupid for accepting 150m and end up having to over pay for lesser players when you no longer have a striker

Even with him are you making top 4 this year?

Go after the next couple of prospects in line like a Haaland etc I know given Spurs current team predicament but still you get my point.

 

[Memphis]

Frightening.

Hopefully Levy is as stubborn and rich as we think he is.

On paper yes.

Tbh not sure Harry Kane would fit into Peps system as good as most think, as great as he is until it happens and he's banging in goals I'll remain sceptical.

 

[Cruyff14]

On paper yes.

Tbh not sure Harry Kane would fit into Peps system as good as most think, as great as he is until it happens and he's banging in goals I'll remain sceptical.

Really? Kane has excellent vision, passing and movement too, I reckon he would have no problem.

Imagine Grealish and KDB feeding balls to Kane. He would score for fun.

 

[jod23]

Really? Kane has excellent vision, passing and movement too, I reckon he would have no problem.

Imagine Grealish and KDB feeding balls to Kane. He would score for fun.

Yeah he'd crush it at City. Absolutely crush it.

 

[SM]

Yeah he'd crush it at City. Absolutely crush it.

Must be pretty worrying times for Liverpool.

 

[Lunchlady Doris]

Pretty sure Jay is rapping about selling cocaine there. Good choice.

 

[moomba]

City can afford it so why not.

LOL. Why stop at £200m. Hold out for £300m, we can afford it.

That's how.things work in the real world surely.

 

[Zidane98]

LOL. Why stop at £200m. Hold out for £300m, we can afford it.

That's how.things work in the real world surely.

Strange.

 

[SM]

LOL. Why stop at £200m. Hold out for £300m, we can afford it.

That's how.things work in the real world surely.

Well technically speaking you could have afforded him for $250m at least, if you'd foregone Grealish who doesn't seem a vital cog in the City machine.

 

[Memphis]

LOL. Why stop at £200m. Hold out for £300m, we can afford it.

That's how.things work in the real world surely.

Levy would still say no.

 

[RPCB]

Only state-funded clubs can afford Grealish and Kane. Manchester City are NOT a state-funded club.

 

[moomba]

Well technically speaking you could have afforded him for $250m at least, if you'd foregone Grealish who doesn't seem a vital cog in the City machine.

Technically speaking we could.

But you don't pay what you can afford on a player, you pay what you think he's worth.

 

[SM]

Technically speaking we could.

But you don't pay what you can afford on a player, you pay what you think he's worth.

Don't disagree, and then it comes down to the vagaries of valuing a player - is it what he's worth to the selling club, to the buying club, somewhere in between or none of the above.

 

[moomba]

Don't disagree, and then it comes down to the vagaries of valuing a player - is it what he's worth to the selling club, to the buying club, somewhere in between or none of the above.

Correct, and that's where we stand at the moment.

 

[mike123]

Arsenal need to focus on other areas, not spend 30mil on a backup keeper.

Our first keeper didn’t even cost that much

 

[moomba]

Strange.

Did anyone get 6.29 in the "what time will Zidane take someone's post and repeat it back to them because he can't think of his own response" sweep?