Re: Calls for Varcoe to be dropped
What and work for 200k? Pfffttt
What and work for 200k? Pfffttt
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He signed a long term deal in January this year.
Interesting suggestion from Turbo. Maybe Adam not being there is having an effect?
Perhaps he gets a week coming off the bench as a sub, with the directive, "you've got one and a half quarters to work as a high impact player, now get out there and really show us what you've got."
Anyway, at 9-0, Chris seems to know what he's doing so far!
He signed a long term deal in January this year.
Interesting suggestion from Turbo. Maybe Adam not being there is having an effect?[/quote]
Maybe we should do a D and A we may have pissed the wrong one off.
No way needs more work at the contest not less,and If he's got to go back to the 2s to get it so be it.
Exactly. Remain absolutely nonplussed as to how normal selection criteria doesn't apply to him. Especially on recent form.
You mean his form vs the Suns? He wouldnt be dropped on his "recent" form vs Hawks and Blues.
This is the trouble for us supporting Trav through this form slump. The negs just mash it all up like his form is the one thing. Total rubbish. I am certain for the people who wanted him dropped, they would be the same whiners complaining about a whole host of things as to why we lost to the Blues without those match winning goals.
And personally I dont think anyone's family issues regardless of how relevant belong in a public forum.
got on the end of others good work and finished well I admit
D
Are you worried he'll find it hard to gather possessions in the 2's, don't know about you but I am,
Don't think the coaching staff would've been fooled by that 3 goal 3rd quarter vs the Blues, got on the end of others good work and finished well I admit, but barely touched it for first half and the remaining quarter.
It was the lump sum of his game. About 12 possessions I think.
Last week was an embrassment, the way he bounced his backside off a couple of Suns players looked comical.
Are you worried he'll find it hard to gather possessions in the 2's, don't know about you but I am, if he's got to get his own ball rather than rely on being fed in the seniors he might be in trouble.
Anyhow, doesn't deserve his spot ATM, just hope Scott stands by his words and plays those that have earnt it.
You didnt happen to venture down to princess park in 91 to watch the reserves play when one of the games greatest players only got 5 touches did you?
Some people play better around higher quality. There is no doubt.
I don't care about his possessions. It's intent I care about. And you can show that in the 2's
I thought he was playing to keep his testicles away from the action to be honest. Shithouse performance.
AGREE. How were his efforts the last 2 times we played Hawks? THE TACKLE of the year on a rampaging Buddy, that goal this year. Just when we needed a goal against Swans, against Blues. There is no way I'd like to see him do that Varcoe magic in the 2's. Not yet. His problem appears to be that his potential mid role has been taken by Stokes, and he is floundering around as a goal sneak and thus just flashes in and out. Maybe a bit more responsibility, and admittedly, a lot more effort around the contests.He wasn't great against the Suns, correct.
But how many times has he stood up when we have really needed someone to? I think all of his great goals have come against the better sides.
Sorry VC, all the good intentions in the world will ultimately achieve nothing, unless accompanied by actions.
Don't care about his possessions? you must be joking, that's what its all about, or does everybody else have to justify themselves ( their selection) but Travie can please himself?? LOL.
He's far away from being a great, unlike the true No 5, can he proove himself in the two's that the question!
If he can then, great, come back in, no problem with that?
Other players get dropped Dave,VC, if he's as great as you say then he'll quickly prove his superiority, don't you think????
We need to present our best team each week, why wouldn't you agree on improving our chances of success by seeing this guy qualify himself amongst those pressing for an opportunity which he is being gifted.
That's a first class response Dave, you're no dope! maybe I do expect not necessarily quantum possessions, but a high imput factor with all players,no matter their team role.
It could be the issue, his role is not what suits, however, the last two weeks apart from the cameo third quarter against Carlton have been lacking intensity which is obvious to all.
We've now got some little toughnuts that are dying to get a game, for instance little Bundy, played 11/2 quarters for a dozen possessions and fed Varcoe his first goal in the third against Carlton.
How do you think he'd feel if Varcoe keeps getting picked over him, you do have a duty toward the others, that's what went wrong under Thompson, just kept playing the same old.
Mate, I am as dumb as dog shit after a few rums...
Intensity IS an issue I grant that. And just between you and I, I see good things in young Bundy, so I take your point.
Lets see how things transpire over the next few weeks when we play some big games....and revisit because all players including Varcoe need to show they can mix it with the big boys, and the upcoming games will provide us an opportunity to see who can do it when the heats on.
The big games in September are what its all about in the long run.
Fine!
If he plays he plays, and good luck, for the teams sake.
Think we all need patience for the next 3-4 weeks while they shuffle things about.
Looks like Hawkins is under the pump from Scott, although I like his strength and tackling power around the packs its just not happening enough according to the coach. Just hope this ignites the fire what with the emergence of Vardy as well, our tall stocks need a boost.