- Thread starter
- #151
LOL. Don't put words in my mouth. I trust science and scientists ( though perhaps not those trustworthy scientists working on Corona viruses in Wuhan Labs) who aren't afraid of scrutiny and know there is far more in this universe we don't know than we know. Plenty of good scientists have that kind of genuine belief set. I'm not sure you're one of them, you appear to be an ideologue, the type that forms lightning rods for oppositions to gather around and attack due to your dogmatic approach. It's a somewhat short sighted, counter productive approach IMHO, even for your own ends, but perhaps beyond your comprehension.Fair enough....if you don't trust science and scientists, I can't force you to.
I hope for your daughter's sake that enough believe and trust the science of vaccination to provide enough herd immunity for her.
All you had to do was take a genuine non dogmatic approach to the positives of seeking treatment options to go along with Vaccines, as we do for everything by the way, including the flu, because it is always going to be part of a holistic approach, but you couldn't.
When people like yourself can't take the genuine reality road, you set that example for the "public" to rally against. Everyone knows in their heart there will be further research and development of more options that aid in treatment. That doesn't alter the need for vaccination as part of the mitigation toolkit, nor does it halt the requirement for constant evaluation and re-evaluation of all newly developed products. Just stop with the I'm a scientist I know everything crap. You don't and only dangerously short sighted "scientists" portray themselves as such.
"The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know" Albert Einstein.
Last edited: