WCE/Rich/Coll/Port trade for the experts to dissect!

[Deepthroat]

I'm on a roll today.

How's about:

WCE

IN: 4, 11, 22

OUT: Kerr, Seaby

RICH

IN: Seaby

OUT: 26

COLL

IN: Kerr

OUT: Didak, 11

PORT

IN: Didak, 26

OUT: 4, 22

That looks very fair to me.

 

[FIGJAM]

I'd rather give Didak someone like Mitch Robinson to play with in the middle than have an injured Kerr on the sidelines!

 

[LemmingMaster]

Maybe I am way off the mark, but I actually rate Didak and Kerr as rather even.

Both have their off field problems and are both amazing players.

So Collingwood are getting ripped off in my eyes, so sounds like a perfect deal!

 

[Crypt Keeper]

Please sir, may I have another?

We're going to give up a GUN in Didak, plus apotential 10-year GUN (pick 11)from the last 'superdraft', for a 'more troubled than Didak' GUN who needs his buddies around him to play well?

 

[robertg22]

Noooo way we're giving Dids for Kerr PLUS pick 11. Would do the swap though.
If you could give me Kerr + 12-18 pick for Didak & 11 I would probably do it.

 

[The Ironist]

It is an interesting one. Would port prefer Didak or someone like Vickery a ruckman with pick 4

 

[Black 18]

Nah, we have more than enough small forwards (yes, even though didak is a very good one) at present. And he's not an elite mid as many on the Collingwood board would have us believe.

Trading pick 4 for a small forward is the last thing Port need, plus not to mention losing 4 spots with our 2nd rounder too.

 

[rota69]

Richmond get smashed on that trade.

 

[JezBlues]

I'm on a roll today.
WCE

IN: 4, 11, 22

OUT: Kerr, Seaby

I think its pretty easily to tell who you barrack for

you must be dreaming

 

[barnesy]

thought the AFL limited multi trades to only two possible three clubs.

No multi club deals.

 

[LemmingMaster]

Richmond get smashed on that trade.

I actually think you "may" give up that pick for a ruckman.

 

[manureid]

If Port did that i would be physically ill.

 

[Big Bad Buddy]

I actually think you "may" give up that pick for a ruckman.

You have got to be kidding me. Hopfully not, Richmond need to stock up their foward line. :

Lets say we trade pick 26 to WCE for Seaby
And the man richmond want Vickery slides to pick 8 We would get screwed. In stead of giving up 2nd rounder for Seaby. Maybe 3rd rounder + Player don't need like JON!

I don't really care anyway. As long as we get Vickery/Sidebottom/Hartlett

 

[Papa G]

Maybe I am way off the mark, but I actually rate Didak and Kerr as rather even.

You are. Kerr is better than Didak. Probably about an additional second rounder better.

 

[rota69]

I actually think you "may" give up that pick for a ruckman.

Not for Seaby, id give up 26 for Warnock, Kosi or Charman.

 

[Kaladin Stormblessed]

Add West Coast's priorty or second rounder (pick 18/20) to Collingwood and it looks alright.

 

[worsfold]

Richmond get smashed on that trade.

Better ring your club cause they know its going to cost more than just pick 26.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24437818-5012432,00.html

"While Richmond will not give up its first national draft selection, No8 overall, its second-round selection (No26) could be used as part of a deal to satisfy the Eagles.
Tigers general manager of football operations Craig Cameron said: "We're in preliminary discussions with West Coast."
The Eagles, who will almost certainly replace Seaby by drafting West Australian ruckman Nick Naitanui with their first pick (No2 overall), will demand a better deal than Richmond's second-round draft selection."

 

[rusman]

I'm on a roll today.

How's about:

WCE

IN: 4, 11, 22

OUT: Kerr, Seaby (I laughed here)

RICH

IN: Seaby

OUT: 26

COLL

IN: Kerr

OUT: Didak, 11 (Then i laughed again here at the army thats about to storm this thread in outrage)

PORT

IN: Didak, 26

OUT: 4, 22

That looks very fair to me.

In all a funny post.

 

[worsfold]

Add West Coast's priorty or second rounder (pick 18/20) to Collingwood and it looks alright.

More likely we'll add what ever extra we get from Richmond for Seaby

 

[Wally07]

We get scr*wed. Pick 26 for a coburg reserves player does not seem right.

I cannot believe my club is showing interest.

 

[Solace]

Don't underestimate seaby. He is a much better tap ruckman (in directing them) than Cox, and if he was #1 ruck in any AFL side i think he would be in the top 5 of the AFL rather easily.

His issue is that he is a confidence player and gets a bit down in Cox's shadow. Whenver asked to be the sole ruck he has really stepped up, in particular with hitouts to advantage, which he is far superiour to Cox in. One of our most dominant periods over the last 3 years has been with Seaby in ruck, and just palming it to our midfield like Cox never could.

Pick 26 = fair. Most people would give that up for Hunter yet i would not give a 3rd round pick for him so its not a case of overrating an eagle. Give him a year as the main ruck and you will get a top 10 pick for him next year.

 

[Youdy]

lol all the richmond supporters hating on seaby

If u look at his career statistics then at his games where cox hasn't played he is right up there with the elite ruckman of the afl

 

[goodie23]

Not for Seaby, id give up 26 for Warnock, Kosi or Charman.

That's nice, but you wouldn't get any of them for that

 

[rota69]

Better ring your club cause they know its going to cost more than just pick 26.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24437818-5012432,00.html

"While Richmond will not give up its first national draft selection, No8 overall, its second-round selection (No26) could be used as part of a deal to satisfy the Eagles.
Tigers general manager of football operations Craig Cameron said: "We're in preliminary discussions with West Coast."
The Eagles, who will almost certainly replace Seaby by drafting West Australian ruckman Nick Naitanui with their first pick (No2 overall), will demand a better deal than Richmond's second-round draft selection."

Will not buy a Richmond membership if we give more than pick 26 for him and will be very dissapointed if we just swap him for that pick, lucky Melbounre is winning the race for him.

 

[ndot]

I'm on a roll today.

How's about:

WCE

IN: 4, 11, 22

OUT: Kerr, Seaby

RICH

IN: Seaby

OUT: 26

COLL

IN: Kerr

OUT: Didak, 11

PORT

IN: Didak, 26

OUT: 4, 22

That looks very fair to me.

it's been stated publicly that we wont part with kerr for less than a top 5 pick AND a top 10 pick, so no.

west coast hold all the power in these negotiations