dogwatch
Premium Platinum
Great work Roogal.This is the latest that I gleaned from the Development Victoria and Ballarat Council reps at Eureka Stadium on Wednesday. The first thing that I noticed is that they are not mucking about, demolition of the old showgrounds is well underway. They want the Athletics facility completely finished by April 2026.
I asked all of the questions that I thought that you folks would ask:
Q. Looking at the old Showgrounds, there are some heritage WW2 pavilions and huts that originated at the old Ballarat RAAF Base, is there any plan to preserve or relocate those?
A. We considered them and the general consensus was that they had no historical value. ... Yes, I nearly fell off my broomstick!
Q. You have a small carpark planned adjacent to Howitt Street, is there any other plan to expand carparking in the vicinity of the stadium beyond that?
A. That is not within our scope in this stage of the development.
Q. The stadium's lighting I consider to be its Achilles Heal. I was here during that horror July 18 game where the lighting and supplementary lights were totally inadequate. Is an upgrade to be included as part of this development?
A. That is not within our scope in this stage of the development. The Council are examining their options for this.
In July 2018 after the horror game against Port Adelaide when Ballarat's weather unleashed its best Winter blast, the media lambasted Ballarat and the Mayor Samantha McIntosh said at that time that "Lighting improvements will be part of any Council conditions for future stadium upgrades", so what happened? Wouldn't it be easier to relocate the existing light towers to the new athletics centre and install new higher output LED fitted light towers similar to those at Ikon Park and the VUWO for a piddling sum of $4 million? Crickets!!!!
You do realise that as long as the existing lighting situation remains that Ballarat will never get prime time TV free-to-air TV exposure, or have a shot at hosting BBL cricket in Summer like Launceston, Canberra and even Albury currently do? It does seem to be almost anti "Development Victoria" doesn't it? An awkward laugh was the response.
Q. You are effectively removing a 4000-capacity standing hill and replacing with two stands of 5000 seating, does this mean that capacity will increase?
A. The Council think that 11,000 is a good number in consideration of prevailing parking and transport access limitations. My response - That probably makes sense given that the State Government have indicated that they are not interested in a train platform or railway station in the vicinity this side of 2030. I noticed on the drive in tonight that the old MB Johns site is now being carved up and will soon be covered with small commercial and industrial businesses. That was an opportunity lost.
Q. Okay, so what about the South-Western boundary between the existing video scoreboard and the South-Western standing hill. Is there a plan to increase standing elevated capacity in that part of the ground?
A. That part of the ground will be modified, including moving the scoreboard more toward the goals and there will be elevated pathways constructed so there will be some increased elevated standing area in that zone. Our aim is to enhance total accessibility around the stadium. That there will be no stairs or ramps, just gradiented pathways. We will even modify the whole Gate 2 entrance to remove steps.
Q. Why did the designers create two stands and propose to place them where they have? Wouldn't it have been better to extend the existing main stand southward to block the southerly winds that have significant impact on the on field play?
A. The Ballarat Council insisted that they didn't want a big stand or a Kardinia Park clone, that they wanted the stadium to retain a regional vibe. So the two stands were made smaller and strategically positioned to frame the historic Selkirk Chimney from the main TV camera angle. ... You mean the pay-per-view Kayo TV camera angle? ... A polite awkward laugh was the response.
Q. You are no doubt aware that the original architects (Peddle Thorp) future proofed the begezzus out of this stadium as part of the first stage design and build?
A. What do you mean? ... For instance, the existing stands were designed for expansion with minimal cost and effort. Look across at the Eastern Stand. The roof is designed to be removed easily and rows added rearward to extend that stand's capacity by a further 2000. I can see how easy it would be to remove the existing roof and more or less replicate a new 3000 capacity stand to virtually mirror the two new stands that are about to be built. Eventually you would have three stands identical around the eastern boundary of the stadium?
At this point, they realised that they weren't talking to a novice or interested bystander, their answers were more on point
A. (The Ballarat Council representative looking at me surprised) You are exactly right! We did examine that as one of our first options for this stage but presently the boundary for the stadium's fence line along Creswick Road would limit rearward extension, but we are now working through the legalities to extend the fence boundary out by several metres to allow for the next stage of seating expansion to occur on the Eastern Stand when that occurs.
They did ask me at this point what my interest was in this, and I explained that I was an interested former North Ballarat Sports Club worker and North Melbourne Tragic. The guy who I spoke to said "Quote ... North Melbourne could be playing two games a year on this ground along with the Bulldogs in the future". I responded ... "Not likely, the Western Bulldogs fought tooth and nail to get North Melbourne the Hell out of Ballarat in 2014 striking a deal with Dan Andrews. Yes, North had a fantastic relationship here with the Roosters and it supported both clubs wonderfully. North even built up a big support base here locally by 2014, but the Bulldogs have invested a lot of time and resources to establish their roots here in the community and to build a strong support base among the kids in the schools since 2015. They definitely would NOT welcome or want any other club sharing territory here ... Seriously, that isn't going to happen. I would consider Bendigo and the development of the Queen Elizabeth Oval as a serious alternative consideration for North Melbourne, but they need to get on the front foot now with that and not lob back into Victoria four years from now scratching their heads. If they want funding for that, they have to start now.
Q. You have allocated a generous recreational space on the Western side of the old Showgrounds, why not expand carparking there?
A. The Council indicated that they wanted that space reserved for future recreational use. They indicated that it should be able to accommodate a soccer pitch.
Q. These are going to be reasonably large stands by regional standards, how much bigger will they each be compared with the existing Western Stand as a reference point?
A. The new stands will occupy a bigger footprint because the existing Western Stand currently seats 3200. The new stands will be noticeably higher because they will have more rows of seating, but he seating pitch will be identical to the Western Stand. The roofline will be about 25 metres at their highest point relative to the oval, whereas the Western Stand is 17 metres.
Q. The concept diagrams indicate rooms beneath the new stands, what will those be used for?
A. These areas will accommodate toilets, dedicated mother's rooms for baby changing and feeding. Additional change rooms and official areas for first aid, plus we will have under cover dedicated zones for food vans and so on. ... That's fair enough, it would be a waste of resource to build dedicated kitchens and bars particularly when a lot of the charm of coming to a game here involves the range of food choices that come from the local food vans and the simple fact that the prices are cheaper and you can have a full-strength bevvy from a can. On a personal note, I am glad that you've kept the old scoreboard. Back in the day I served cans from the old "Can Bar"
Q. On a different subject ... The athletics facility. A blue athletics track?
A. We have decided that the track will be a unique blue to match the blue of the original Eureka Flag. We have worked closely with the Ballarat Athletics Association to deliver what we believe will be the very best facility outside a capital city in Australia.
There was more general discussion after that over tea and scones, but it was of a more general nature. I hope that I have shed some light on this for you all. There are some plusses, but I also personally think ... Not enough, my emotions on this are mixed but overall still positive.
View attachment 2033854
View attachment 2033856
I really appreciate your taking the time to do the research and post what you know here.