dogwatch
Premium Platinum
This is a very poorly written article but I'm posting it here because the underlying topic is of great importance (Concussion injuries and the AFL's handling of the issue). I had to read it three times and I'm still not sure I fully understand who said what or who the review panel was. As the original report was quite critical of the AFL and has now been substantiated I'm assuming most of this article is from an AFL press release and that they're quite happy for it to be fairly confusing to the media and the general public who will quickly move onto something else.
An interesting point is that the review seems to suggest Prof McCrory plagiarised something or other. That's quite an accusation. No details were provided and no response was reported from McCrory.
Bottom line is that the AFL's original research project "was under-funded and under-resourced and suffered from a lack of governance, stewardship and coordination in how it was rolled-out and implemented, and how it simultaneously accommodated clinical and research objectives".
Quite an admission from the AFL and it's a finding they accept. Naturally they say "but things are much better now".
Let's hope that's the case.
Players 'let down' by AFL concussion study
Former players who participated in the AFL's concussion research project receive an apology from the league after an independent review into the study.
www.abc.net.au
An interesting point is that the review seems to suggest Prof McCrory plagiarised something or other. That's quite an accusation. No details were provided and no response was reported from McCrory.
Bottom line is that the AFL's original research project "was under-funded and under-resourced and suffered from a lack of governance, stewardship and coordination in how it was rolled-out and implemented, and how it simultaneously accommodated clinical and research objectives".
Quite an admission from the AFL and it's a finding they accept. Naturally they say "but things are much better now".
Let's hope that's the case.
Last edited: