Strategy What to do with pick 1 now we’ve got it - Do We Need Reid or is it Curtins

Keep pick 1, or trade it?


  • Total voters
    397
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've had enough of all of these kents already.

Nothing would satisfy me more right now than drafting H.Reid and watch him kick a bag against the tin-rattlers.


And anyone else wanting to entertain splitting the pick in this massively compromised draft needs to give themselves an uppercut as well.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Now that north have been kissed on the dick with all these extra draft picks, I think you really gotta squeeze it out of them.

I’m telling them to trade away their two first rounders for GC4, then giving us 2,3 and 4 for 1. Put up or shut up.
Must be nice living in fantasy world.
Now come back down to earth.
Why would North do that if they have pick 2,3,4.

Come on that's just crazy.
North will be happy with three top picks. Would you honestly do that trade if you were a recruiter for North. Hell no you wouldn't.

They will draft McKercher Curtin and Sanders. I think it's solid shut here that's non negotiable in Norths position.

We will just draft Reid and be happy.
 
Last edited:
Must be nice living in fantasy world.
Now come back down to earth.
Why would North do that if they have pick 2,3,4.

Come on that's just crazy.
North will be happy with three top picks. Would you honestly do that trade if you were a recruiter for North. Hell no you wouldn't.

They will draft McKercher Curtin and Sanders. I think it's solid shut here that's non negotiable in Norths position.

We will just draft Reid and be happy.
Unless they are hellbent on Reid.
If offered, no matter how unlikely, can't see the club saying no to Curtin, McKercher and Sanders/Duursma.
 
It would be 2,3 and 5.
Hawks have pick 3 which would be pushed out to 4 if norf get band 1 compo pick 3. GC pick 4 moves out to 5 in that scenario too
Apologies for the intervention but going by all accounts Hawthorn is all but sold on getting Duursma leaving North to use their next pick(if they get it) to select Sanders if they still want him at that pick.
 
Apologies for the intervention but going by all accounts Hawthorn is all but sold on getting Duursma leaving North to use their next pick(if they get it) to select Sanders if they still want him at that pick.
Madness if North take Sanders over Watson, you're already stacked for mids and you'd be adding McKercher already.
 
We have invested a lot into Sanders but its true , we do need a small forward...
You've already got plenty of accumulator and hard nut types. I'm not a big fan of Caddy but North should even go him over Sanders. I think pick 5 to North is a done deal and you will just use 2, 3 and 5 rather than trade up to 1.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You have invested absolutely nothing into Sanders.
They have invested by asking the AFL "please can you help us and give us Sanders. Pretty please, we need extra picks because we are pathetic and can't manage our football club or do anything for ourselves like other clubs, please help us." Asking for handouts is Kangas investing in players lol.
 
Must be nice living in fantasy world.
Now come back down to earth.
Why would North do that if they have pick 2,3,4.

Come on that's just crazy.
North will be happy with three top picks. Would you honestly do that trade if you were a recruiter for North. Hell no you wouldn't.

They will draft McKercher Curtin and Sanders. I think it's solid shut here that's non negotiable in Norths position.

We will just draft Reid and be happy.
You’ve made my point without realising it.

Unless we get something ridiculous, we have to take Reid.

Unless we get something ridiculous…
 
I think 2 and 3 for 1 and 19 is the offer that we'll have to get our heads around. I'm not sure if I'd do it but think thats what it will boil down to.
 
When did north get 3?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
They haven’t got it yet but there’s an expectation that the FA compo for McKay will be pick 3

Whether or not that’s justified is open for debate
 
You’ve made my point without realising it.

Unless we get something ridiculous, we have to take Reid.

Unless we get something ridiculous…
Oh ok. Is that what you were getting at.
Was confused thinking that trade suggestion is pretty much impossible for us to obtain lol. Agreed Reid it is.
 
2,14 and their future 19,20 I would take for 1 and 39. Go to the draft with 2,14,20,34 and 53.

Otherwise just keep pick 1. The above is well overs but not to the point of bigfooty ridiculous, just AFL level ridiculous.

North still have 1, 19, 39,40 and whatever compo pick they have. They could very likely buy 29 off of GC on the night for 39,40.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top