Ocha905
and Weighted Companion Cube
Ooh I forgot about The Northman. That also looks mint.I loved the witch and I think the Northman is fantastic as well.
The lighthouse didn’t work at all for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ooh I forgot about The Northman. That also looks mint.I loved the witch and I think the Northman is fantastic as well.
The lighthouse didn’t work at all for me.
I loved the witch and I think the Northman is fantastic as well.
The lighthouse didn’t work at all for me.
The promotion of Northman was extremely misleading, you can't avoid trailers at the cinema but its a good example of why I don't like themI loved the witch and I think the Northman is fantastic as well.
The lighthouse didn’t work at all for me.
Yeh a lot like Drive it was promoted as an action film when it was never gonna be that. If you knew nothing about Eggers you’d have every right to be shitty that movie wasn’t what they made it appear.The promotion of Northman was extremely misleading, you can't avoid trailers at the cinema but its a good example of why I don't like them
they either ruin all the main plot points or pretend the movie is something it isn't to try and attract a larger audience
Same. The lighthouse just didn’t land at all for me.Just on Eggers, that Nosferatu trailer looks great. Huge fan of him outside the Lighthouse.
it was the first of his movies I had seenYeh a lot like Drive it was promoted as an action film when it was never gonna be that. If you knew nothing about Eggers you’d have every right to be shitty that movie wasn’t what they made it appear.
Same. The lighthouse just didn’t land at all for me.
Spot on regarding the marketing of Northman. Found it to be a big disappointment. Witch excellent. Lighthouse i enjoyed..a bit nuts but enjoyed the two actors and feel of how desolate a place it wasThe promotion of Northman was extremely misleading, you can't avoid trailers at the cinema but its a good example of why I don't like them
they either ruin all the main plot points or pretend the movie is something it isn't to try and attract a larger audience
Yes he wasHome Alone
Not to overstate it but McCauley Culkin was some sort of child actor.
I enjoyed it. Watched it last night and it was perfect for winding down on a Sunday night. Tight little action/thriller. I like Bateman and Egerton usually and thought they played off each other well.Carry-On
A lot like Red One but imo a bit better. Low expectation action/thriller that hangs together pretty competently and had a pretty rewarding payoff.
I’ve read a lot of criticisms about plot armour, I’d have to assume those people haven’t watched a lot of action adventure films. This one absolutely had it but not excessively or outlandishly.
Yeah it's not good. And the extra Beyonce song feels very shoehorned in and completely overwrought. The original is far far superior.The Lion King (live action remake)
Was on TV the other night so had a gander. It... exists? I don't know how to describe it. It feels like an expensive high school project. There's really nothing going on here other than visual effects? I hate to be a back in my day, but it feels like every single aspect is lesser than the original. The acting and casting is worse. The redone music and songs are worse. The slight adjustments and additions add nothing. It's probably an ok time passer, if you are with kids or something, but the only part of it that had any staying power, was how unnecessary it all felt. There's not a single reason this should ever be watched rather than the cartoon animated film.
A film that was produced and released/10
There’s a prequel out soon in the same style about Mufasa too….The Lion King (live action remake)
Was on TV the other night so had a gander. It... exists? I don't know how to describe it. It feels like an expensive high school project. There's really nothing going on here other than visual effects? I hate to be a back in my day, but it feels like every single aspect is lesser than the original. The acting and casting is worse. The redone music and songs are worse. The slight adjustments and additions add nothing. It's probably an ok time passer, if you are with kids or something, but the only part of it that had any staying power, was how unnecessary it all felt. There's not a single reason this should ever be watched rather than the cartoon animated film.
A film that was produced and released/10
The issue is it isn't even really bad... if you have not seen the original, maybe it has something offer. If you have though, it offers nothing.Yeah it's not good. And the extra Beyonce song feels very shoehorned in and completely overwrought. The original is far far superior.
Carry-On
A lot like Red One but imo a bit better. Low expectation action/thriller that hangs together pretty competently and had a pretty rewarding payoff.
I’ve read a lot of criticisms about plot armour, I’d have to assume those people haven’t watched a lot of action adventure films. This one absolutely had it but not excessively or outlandishly.
Had too many conveniences to suit the plot.
1. You cant traverse LA easily yet the antagonists could jump from one house to another like it was a miracle during peak holiday rush hour in LA. And find information and hack into all relevant databases.
2. The ability to drive around peak travel time at will through LAX in itself was a holiday miracle. Not to mention the prime ability to find a prime place to shoot right into the terminal check in. What are the odds.
3. The police all on holidays? you can not walk through any airport in the modern world without an influx of police like everywhere. Yet none, not 1 anywhere in the terminal. how convenient.
4. All the workers just disappear underneath the terminal?
5. Security would have had the security feeds too hence the cameras. A TSA agent acting really weird and being really slow would have been picked up immediately.
It was ok. A bit of fun. But the antogonists seem to be able to just do what they want.
Whoever said it was a modern die hard should be fired from their promotional job. Because it certainly wasnt.
I think the first two aren’t really plot, the whole thing seems to happen over an unspecified amount of time? Plus unless there is a countdown does it really matter?Had too many conveniences to suit the plot.
1. You cant traverse LA easily yet the antagonists could jump from one house to another like it was a miracle during peak holiday rush hour in LA. And find information and hack into all relevant databases.
2. The ability to drive around peak travel time at will through LAX in itself was a holiday miracle. Not to mention the prime ability to find a prime place to shoot right into the terminal check in. What are the odds.
3. The police all on holidays? you can not walk through any airport in the modern world without an influx of police like everywhere. Yet none, not 1 anywhere in the terminal. how convenient.
4. All the workers just disappear underneath the terminal?
5. Security would have had the security feeds too hence the cameras. A TSA agent acting really weird and being really slow would have been picked up immediately.
It was ok. A bit of fun. But the antogonists seem to be able to just do what they want.
Whoever said it was a modern die hard should be fired from their promotional job. Because it certainly wasnt.