rdhopkins2
Carpe Diem
Re: Whitecross offered a week - And the Hawks challenge a patently absurd charge
For anyone interested in the AFL rules and how the tribunal works, these links take you to the relevant sections on the AFL official site.
AFL Laws of the Game
AFL Tribunal System 2012
"A player can appeal on the following points:
Error in law.
■■
That the decision was so unreasonable that no Tribunal acting reasonably
could have come to that decision having regard to the evidence before it.
■■
Classification of offence manifestly excessive.
■■
Sanction imposed manifestly excessive.
■■"
So I'm guessing we're appealing on the grounds "That the decision was so unreasonable that no Tribunal acting reasonably could have come to that decision having regard to the evidence before it."
For anyone interested in the AFL rules and how the tribunal works, these links take you to the relevant sections on the AFL official site.
AFL Laws of the Game
AFL Tribunal System 2012
"A player can appeal on the following points:
Error in law.
■■
That the decision was so unreasonable that no Tribunal acting reasonably
could have come to that decision having regard to the evidence before it.
■■
Classification of offence manifestly excessive.
■■
Sanction imposed manifestly excessive.
■■"
So I'm guessing we're appealing on the grounds "That the decision was so unreasonable that no Tribunal acting reasonably could have come to that decision having regard to the evidence before it."