Opinion Why are the interstate teams so bad? How do we fix them?

Remove this Banner Ad

Since 1997

Club
P
W
L
D
Win %
Geel
589​
374​
210​
5​
63.92​
Syd
587​
338​
244​
5​
58.01​
Haw
576​
314​
257​
5​
54.95​
W.C.
579​
314​
261​
4​
54.58​
Adel
577​
310​
266​
1​
53.81​
P.A.
572​
304​
263​
5​
53.58​
Coll
579​
303​
272​
4​
52.68​
W.B.
573​
287​
281​
5​
50.52​
N.M.
571​
286​
281​
4​
50.44​
Ess
566​
279​
281​
6​
49.82​
Rich
563​
270​
286​
7​
48.58​
Bris
572​
272​
294​
6​
48.08​
St.K
569​
268​
293​
8​
47.80​
GWS
228​
102​
122​
4​
45.61​
Frem
560​
251​
308​
1​
44.91​
Melb
562​
226​
332​
4​
40.57​
Carl
560​
213​
343​
4​
38.39​
G.C.
237​
59​
176​
2​
25.32​

I see clubs with more to complain about than Port.
 
You guys joined our league.

Feel free to form your own breakaway leagus if you expansion 'franchises' from non Victoria are finding it too hard to win flags because of your own club inadequacies.

The arrogance and ignorance of that diatribe is appalling.
Yes, and if we werent in your league now you wouldnt have a league because 5 games per week wouldnt bring in enough revenue from TV deals, what dont you get about that.
 
Compared to one league with
A butchered fixture where the local rivalries are locked in as priority
Some teams whining they travel more
Some teams whining they don't get to pick where they play away games
Teams with a home advantage in finals, and other don't

We currently have two divisions as it is - Melbourne teams and non-Melbourne teams. Just make it official and design the competition that then ensures you are competing equally amongst your group.

But no, instead we will have non-Melbourne teams smoking about how hard they have it

I think what I suggested is reasonable, two conferences with five Vic teams each in it, and everyone playing once from the other conference, 4 home and 4 away. That's 24 rounds and every Vic side travelling six times a year and getting to play 6 interstate sides on their home ground as well. I think that's pretty reasonable, as I do understand Vic v Vic games are neutral, so you can't expect Vic sides to travel 8 times a year without getting their fair share of home games against non-Vic sides either.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Since 1997

Club
P
W
L
D
Win %
Geel
589​
374​
210​
5​
63.92​
Syd
587​
338​
244​
5​
58.01​
Haw
576​
314​
257​
5​
54.95​
W.C.
579​
314​
261​
4​
54.58​
Adel
577​
310​
266​
1​
53.81​
P.A.
572​
304​
263​
5​
53.58​
Coll
579​
303​
272​
4​
52.68​
W.B.
573​
287​
281​
5​
50.52​
N.M.
571​
286​
281​
4​
50.44​
Ess
566​
279​
281​
6​
49.82​
Rich
563​
270​
286​
7​
48.58​
Bris
572​
272​
294​
6​
48.08​
St.K
569​
268​
293​
8​
47.80​
GWS
228​
102​
122​
4​
45.61​
Frem
560​
251​
308​
1​
44.91​
Melb
562​
226​
332​
4​
40.57​
Carl
560​
213​
343​
4​
38.39​
G.C.
237​
59​
176​
2​
25.32​

I see clubs with more to complain about than Port.
Redo that from 07 please.
 
I think what I suggested is reasonable, two conferences with five Vic teams each in it, and everyone playing once from the other conference, 4 home and 4 away. That's 24 rounds and every Vic side travelling six times a year and getting to play 6 interstate sides on their home ground as well. I think that's pretty reasonable, as I do understand Vic v Vic games are neutral, so you can't expect Vic sides to travel 8 times a year without getting their fair share of home games against non-Vic sides either.
About as fair as could be without a 34 game h&a season of playing each other twice, it still favours Vic clubs, but nope, not interested.

They're not interested because you don't fix what doesn't need fixing, unless it does, so you hold an inquiry, but only for some.
 
Redo that from 07 please.
Club
P
W
L
D
%
Win %
Geel
361​
262​
97​
2​
130.72​
72.85​
Haw
351​
219​
128​
4​
118.43​
62.96​
Syd
351​
206​
141​
4​
116.30​
59.26​
Coll
352​
205​
143​
4​
111.56​
58.81​
W.C.
344​
189​
154​
1​
106.30​
55.09​
Adel
338​
175​
162​
1​
107.19​
51.92​
Rich
340​
173​
160​
7​
100.02​
51.91​
W.B.
344​
177​
165​
2​
100.29​
51.74​
P.A.
338​
172​
165​
1​
101.41​
51.04​
St.K
338​
160​
172​
6​
96.64​
48.22​
Frem
336​
158​
177​
1​
95.07​
47.17​
N.M.
337​
157​
177​
3​
97.39​
47.03​
GWS
228​
102​
122​
4​
89.92​
45.61​
Ess
331​
145​
182​
4​
91.38​
44.41​
Bris
333​
134​
196​
3​
88.85​
40.69​
Carl
331​
124​
205​
2​
90.19​
37.76​
Melb
330​
116​
211​
3​
84.54​
35.61​
G.C.
237​
59​
176​
2​
72.76​
25.32​

Port still in the top half and still in the black. Their record is quite good for a small club.

Perhaps it's just a case of adjusting to not winning premierships as often as in the SANFL?
 
I think what I suggested is reasonable, two conferences with five Vic teams each in it, and everyone playing once from the other conference, 4 home and 4 away. That's 24 rounds and every Vic side travelling six times a year and getting to play 6 interstate sides on their home ground as well. I think that's pretty reasonable, as I do understand Vic v Vic games are neutral, so you can't expect Vic sides to travel 8 times a year without getting their fair share of home games against non-Vic sides either.
Two conferences with 5 Vic teams, is again 2 conferences of 9.

If you are playing the other conference it is 9 games, some get 4 home others 5?

And it wouldn't change any travel inequality.
 
The AFL is too taxing of a game for everyone to play each other twice, unfortunately.

You'll never get a fair and balanced fixture, but the non-Vic v Vic should be as symmetrical as possible.

I still think 24 rounds with everyone getting 12 home and 12 away games each is optimal.

Vics get 6 of those 12 home games against interstate teams, non-Vics get 6 of those 12 home games against Vics. Non-Vics get more MCG exposure.
 
Club
P
W
L
D
%
Win %
Geel
361​
262​
97​
2​
130.72​
72.85​
Haw
351​
219​
128​
4​
118.43​
62.96​
Syd
351​
206​
141​
4​
116.30​
59.26​
Coll
352​
205​
143​
4​
111.56​
58.81​
W.C.
344​
189​
154​
1​
106.30​
55.09​
Adel
338​
175​
162​
1​
107.19​
51.92​
Rich
340​
173​
160​
7​
100.02​
51.91​
W.B.
344​
177​
165​
2​
100.29​
51.74​
P.A.
338​
172​
165​
1​
101.41​
51.04​
St.K
338​
160​
172​
6​
96.64​
48.22​
Frem
336​
158​
177​
1​
95.07​
47.17​
N.M.
337​
157​
177​
3​
97.39​
47.03​
GWS
228​
102​
122​
4​
89.92​
45.61​
Ess
331​
145​
182​
4​
91.38​
44.41​
Bris
333​
134​
196​
3​
88.85​
40.69​
Carl
331​
124​
205​
2​
90.19​
37.76​
Melb
330​
116​
211​
3​
84.54​
35.61​
G.C.
237​
59​
176​
2​
72.76​
25.32​

Port still in the top half and still in the black. Their record is quite good for a small club.
Right, so the top two are Vic clubs that have benefitted most from FA, theres 5 Vics in the top 8 including 3 of top 4 along with Sydney Cola/Academy.
Looking at the bottom half, Carlton cheated the salary cap and have been a basket case ever since, Essendon cheated with drugs and were decimated for a few seasons.
Melbourne have no excuses apart from just being shit and churning through coaches.
NM have been a basket case since Duck poked his mates Wife
All of these Vic clubs have themselves or their players to blame or they'd be further up the ladder at our expense.
 
Right, so the top two are Vic clubs that have benefitted most from FA, theres 5 Vics in the top 8 including 3 of top 4 along with Sydney Cola/Academy.
Looking at the bottom half, Carlton cheated the salary cap and have been a basket case ever since, Essendon cheated with drugs and were decimated for a few seasons.
Melbourne have no excuses apart from just being sh*t and churning through coaches.
NM have been a basket case since Duck poked his mates Wife
All of these Vic clubs have themselves or their players to blame or they'd be further up the ladder at our expense.
The top two are the teams who play the least games in Melbourne!!

Geelong and Tassie have more in common with Port - ie travelling 9+ times a season, than they do with Collingwood.

Not surprising that 5 of the 9 Melbourne teams have a losing record.
 
Tim Kelly to West Coast, Lachie Neale to Brisbane, Buddy Franklin to Sydney, last year Aliir Aliir and Fantasia to Port, every club can pick up players regardless of which state they are in, just have to make your club attractive enough. While a lot of players return to Vic there are also a lot of clubs competing for those players.
Non Vic to Vic list (free agents or players who asked for trade to certain club):

- Zac Williams
- Devon Smith
- Jye Caldwell
- Dylan Shiel
- Jeremy Cameron
- Patrick Dangerfield
- Tom Mitchell
- Jaeger O'Meara
- Steven May
- Jake Lever
- Ed Langdon
- Adam Tomlinson
- Dion Prestia
- Tom Lynch
- Brad Crouch
- Jack Steele
- Dan Hanneberry
- Zak Jones
- Dougal Howard
- Alex Keath

Vic to non Vic list:

- Bryce Gibbs
- Joe Daniher
- Marcus Adams
- Reece Conca
- James Aish
- Travis Colyer
- Brandon Ellis
- Jarrod Harbrow
- Oleg Markov
- Callan Ward
- Lance Franklin
- Tim Kelly
- Jamie Cripps
- Steven Motlop

Look at quality of players going from non Vic to Vic compared to other way around, it also occurs more often.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Non Vic to Vic list (free agents or players who asked for trade to certain club):

- Zac Williams
- Devon Smith
- Jye Caldwell
- Dylan Shiel
- Jeremy Cameron
- Patrick Dangerfield
- Tom Mitchell
- Jaeger O'Meara
- Steven May
- Jake Lever
- Ed Langdon
- Adam Tomlinson
- Dion Prestia
- Tom Lynch
- Brad Crouch
- Jack Steele
- Dan Hanneberry
- Zak Jones
- Dougal Howard
- Alex Keath

Vic to non Vic list:

- Bryce Gibbs
- Joe Daniher
- Marcus Adams
- Reece Conca
- James Aish
- Travis Colyer
- Brandon Ellis
- Jarrod Harbrow
- Oleg Markov
- Callan Ward
- Lance Franklin
- Tim Kelly
- Jamie Cripps
- Steven Motlop

Look at quality of players going from non Vic to Vic compared to other way around, it also occurs more often.
Buddy Franklin the best there. Quality all round
 
Right, so the top two are Vic clubs that have benefitted most from FA, theres 5 Vics in the top 8 including 3 of top 4 along with Sydney Cola/Academy.
Looking at the bottom half, Carlton cheated the salary cap and have been a basket case ever since, Essendon cheated with drugs and were decimated for a few seasons.
Melbourne have no excuses apart from just being sh*t and churning through coaches.
NM have been a basket case since Duck poked his mates Wife
All of these Vic clubs have themselves or their players to blame or they'd be further up the ladder at our expense.
Benefited the most from free agency?

Through free agency we got Frawley, a delisted Henderson, a delisted Simpkin, Minchington and Vickery lol.
We have lost Buddy, Suckling, Ellis, Young, Murphy, Birchall.
 
Non Vic to Vic list (free agents or players who asked for trade to certain club):

- Zac Williams
- Devon Smith
- Jye Caldwell
- Dylan Shiel
- Jeremy Cameron
- Patrick Dangerfield
- Tom Mitchell
- Jaeger O'Meara
- Steven May
- Jake Lever
- Ed Langdon
- Adam Tomlinson
- Dion Prestia
- Tom Lynch
- Brad Crouch
- Jack Steele
- Dan Hanneberry
- Zak Jones
- Dougal Howard
- Alex Keath

Vic to non Vic list:

- Bryce Gibbs
- Joe Daniher
- Marcus Adams
- Reece Conca
- James Aish
- Travis Colyer
- Brandon Ellis
- Jarrod Harbrow
- Oleg Markov
- Callan Ward
- Lance Franklin
- Tim Kelly
- Jamie Cripps
- Steven Motlop

Look at quality of players going from non Vic to Vic compared to other way around, it also occurs more often.

Then you've got the Jack Gunstons of the world who just get homesick after 2 years and end up with 3 medals back home or draftee's saying they wont go interstate.
 
Benefited the most from free agency?

Through free agency we got Frawley, a delisted Henderson, a delisted Simpkin, Minchington and Vickery lol.
We have lost Buddy, Suckling, Ellis, Young, Murphy, Birchall.
FA or home sickness/ trade requests, all the same, we couldn't keep them, end result the same.
Jake Kelly off to Essendon as we speak.
 
Then you've got the Jack Gunstons of the world who just get homesick after 2 years and end up with 3 medals back home or draftee's saying they wont go interstate.
Remember Wingard refused to go to GWS
 
I can remember in '07 people asking the exact opposite question after interstate teams had won the preceding six flags.

In the last 10 years, by my reckoning, interstate teams have made the GF seven times. So what's the issue?

EDIT: I forgot the Swans in '16. So that's actually eight (consecutive) of the last 10 years.
 
Last edited:
6 years it took for an inquiry into Vic football, 15yrs later and nothing for our struggles and will continue that way unless we do something to make them change their MO.
This hits the nail on the head.

All “interstate” fans need to realise this. This league is not for us. Never has been. We just prop things up financially while the system works to celebrate Victorian football. Unless something changes, best we can hope for is the pinch a flag every now and then.

See West Coast being a 5 goal better side than Collingwood, but falling over the line at the pies home ground for reference. If that doesn’t do it for you, consider back to back to back to… Grand Finals of the higher ranked team having to play away and losing.

The AFL is a total joke. You’re 100% better off following something else, or at least recognising it for what it is and not taking it too seriously.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Why are the interstate teams so bad? How do we fix them?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top