- Aug 21, 2016
- 17,258
- 28,532
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Oldham
- Thread starter
- #1,426
Your complaints are silly. You clearly don't know what you're talking about. Of course the periodic table is still central to the study of chemistry. But modern chemistry exams require less memorisation of the periodic table and more showing of an understanding of how it relates to real world problems than it used to. More higher order thinking skills related to application. Thus questions relate to that. It's only the low order questions that would contain the phrase the periodic table. Students are expected to show their understanding of the periodic table and how elements interact in questions that don't contain the phrase the periodic table..
Sustainability is a major concept in all sciences with in terms of the environment and not.
I studied chemistry until the equivalent of year 12. I was never asked to learn the periodic table but a big chart of it was always on the wall and it was important in understanding why groups of elements had similar properties.
The Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority initially proposed even less emphasis on the periodic table. But there was pushback by chemistry teachers.
Experienced chemistry teacher Melissa MacEoin said the periodic table underpinned the entire study of chemistry and that cutting it from the subject’s study design would be “a bit like learning a language without first of all learning its alphabet so you can put it together”.
“All things are made of atoms, and chemistry is the study of atoms and how they go together. Those atoms are the 118 elements on the periodic table,” Ms MacEoin, who is also the current president of teachers’ group the Chemistry Education Association, said of its proposed removal.
The changes to the curriculum was to incorporate more social science. I would argue that it's better to keep chemistry as a hard science subject - about empirical data and evidence. Subjective aspects such as 'sustainability' could be discussed in more general terms in economics, politics and sociology classes.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander 'knowledge' does not belong at all because it's not science.
Last edited by a moderator: