Wwe tv **spoilers**

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

so play this out until a return at the Rumble?

Boring. HHH I'm the King.woo woo woo woo look at me, spinebuster, weird arm thing, pedigree. I'm the King of Kings or something because I am boring. You are no long King Sheamus. You are butt of many lame PG DX toilet humour jokes about your skin colour and being Irish. I am the King of Kings. Watch out.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

what the f*ck was the point of making mcintyre and jackson a double count out

and i agree with i.m.s way to ruin the miz :thumbsdown:

and what a surprise seeing mysterio cost del rio :eek::eek::eek:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

what the f*ck was the point of making mcintyre and jackson a double count out

every one night tournament has one of these, there simply is not enough time

the 1998 survivor series comes to mind... vince announced a 16 man tournament for the title a few weeks early... i was thinking, 15 matches in 3 hours?!?! no way they can pull that off

Taker and Kane both got a bye seeing as though they both got screwed by austin at the previous ppv during their title match, eliminating 2 matches and a 14 man tournament after all... then there was a double count involving Xpac, eliminating another match.... vince yelling "austin gets a bye?!?! austin gets a bye?!?!"

HHH was advertised even though all the smarks knew that he was injured, Rock gets to face the Bossman and beats him in a seconds.. quickest pinfall ever. Earlier, Mankind beat Duane Gill in half a minute.

So virtually, what was supposed to be 15 matches, ended up at 10.

on a side note, the tournament made it feel like a weird PPV, with the constant shots of Vince backstage... felt more like a 3 hour RAW.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

I am wondering if with all these 3 hour Raws they might be looking at extending it permantly? Could be possible with an end to the brand split given SDs crap slot

Nope, they're just fulfilling contractural obligations.


Del Rio should be given the belt immediately. Kane was given the belt earlier in the year because his Taker story was threatening to take the spotlight away from the belt. Now Del Rio is the man taking the spotlight away. The man is fueding with two of the top three faces on the show by himself at the same time. Give him the belt!
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

Swagger and Kofi put on a fantastic match this week. The mid-carders are more entertaining to watch in ring than the main eventers.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

I really am sick of John Cena, I wish he would **** off for a few months.

Nexus are finished, stick a fork in them.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

CM Punks commentary was brilliant yet again. Got a bit of a pop from the fans when he got up to read the GM's email.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

How f***ing good is Punk's and to a lesser extent Matthews commentary on Raw?

Heel Cole in decent doses as GM and Monday's announce team on a regular basis FTW.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

Just watching the first episode of the new season of NXT, and I have to say, Brodus Clay is the best big man mic worker WWE has had in ages. If Byron Saxton had Clay's mic skills, he could be the next Rock.

For some reason, Conor O'Brian reminds me of one of those early '90s gimmick heels like The Repo Man.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

Byron Saxton funnily enough was a commentator for ECW.

And an anchor on one of Americas news channels. Saxton has the look to make it. For mine he and Clay look the best to move forward.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

Maybe it was just good production but I saw a trailer of the rookies on season 4 on Superstars and it looks like quite a good bunch, obviously haven't seen them in the ring but apart from that Ortiz-esque guy they all seemed to have something going for them.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

you mean, I miss 1 or 2 weeks (however long it has been since Cena made his 1st attack) and come back to see Santino as Tag Team Champ :eek::(

gotta love the comedy of Santino! :D
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

Maybe it was just good production but I saw a trailer of the rookies on season 4 on Superstars and it looks like quite a good bunch, obviously haven't seen them in the ring but apart from that Ortiz-esque guy they all seemed to have something going for them.

they're all "wild and young"
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

you mean, I miss 1 or 2 weeks (however long it has been since Cena made his 1st attack) and come back to see Santino as Tag Team Champ :eek::(

gotta love the comedy of Santino! :D

Santino has to be one of the funniest blokes of all time in the business. Having him and Kozlov as the champs isn't a bad idea its sort of a throwback to the old school odd couple tag team . Santino has also been impressive in the ring since teaming up with Kozlov they just seem to be a good fit for each other.
 
Re: WWE TV thoughts pt 2 **SPOILERS**

David Arquette :thumbsu:

acknowledging his WCW title "reign" too haha.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top