IllBeTheJudge
Premiership Player
- Jun 21, 2008
- 3,396
- 1,587
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- New Orleans Saints, Sth Dragons
Thought I might write a few notes on who I consider to be the bottom 6 regulars of each team in the league, and figured what better way to start than with the best there is: Geelong.
Not everybody is going to agree of course, but what I have attempted to do is take a look at what could be considered the bottom 6 players. Some say these are the most important players on any team's list.
I can't admit to fanatically watching any team (other than mine) nor any 6 particular players, so is my logic flawed? Possibly. Do you think I care? Nowhere near as much as you might expect. What I won't be doing is slagging anybody in particular, and certainly not a first year player. The players I have chosen are what I consider regulars, and not many first year players would therefore qualify.
What's the point of all this? Well, reasoning aside (and let's not focus on that, it's about the personnel), who would you have in the bottom 6 instead? Tell me; tell me now.
When it comes to the Cats, there are no easy players to pick, however ...
David Wojcinski
Missed out on a Grand Final berth last year, and really, probably not undeservedly. This guy has pace to burn. End of resume. How he is still on this particular list is nothing short of astonishing, but someone down at the Cattery must see something in him, as somehow he survives. Occasionally does something good, more often than not turns it over. Looking forward to someone, anyone, defending his spot and implying that he shouldn't be named in the bottom 6.
Corey Enright
What is it exactly that others, namely Geelong supporters, see in this guy? Is a reasonable, decent player at best, but I guess not everyone can be stars. Has played many more games than me I suppose, so must be worth something. Still, if it comes down to "should we pay Gablett that extra 50k" or "lose Enright", I'm comfortable with how those cards will fall.
Andrew Mackie
This is almost certain to get some noses out of joint, but probably not as badly as Joel Selwood's. Must say it's getting difficult to name players from a clearly dominant side, but you have to remember that this isn't simply about "who's crap", it's about "who's in the bottom 6". Luckily for me, Mackie is a bit crap and therefore his inclusion becomes something of a given. Probably takes on bigger blokes than normally expected, especially with Egan now gone for good, and he's certainly one of those triers. When weighed up against many of the other players in the team though, looks like one that could be replaced quite easily with many players running around in the comp.
Mark Blake
Another controversial pick, as he is winning some taps this year, but I think Blake might not be winning the hearts of the Geelong faithful as much as he did a few years ago, where the crowd cheered wildly if he managed to run 30 metres without falling over. Just not doing enough around the ground yet, but time is on his side. Assuming Mumford doesn't overtake him when Ottens gets back. Look, I think this bloke can play, but at the moment he can be exploited.
Harry Taylor
Didn't want to pick on Harry too much but his skills enable him to be selected in this formidable group. A lot of upside to his play, but he must go in hard at the contest, and hopefully can bring his skill level up by foot, and by hand under pressure.
Josh Hunt
Had to think hard about this one. Hunt certainly goes in hard, but is imminently replaceable. Looking through the list who played against the Bulldogs and thinking about who is missing, here was one player who looked like it didn't really matter whether he ever came back. The defense might be a little light without him, but Rooke and Milburn play the sniper roles enough, they don't really need a third.
Until the next team's bottom 6
Not everybody is going to agree of course, but what I have attempted to do is take a look at what could be considered the bottom 6 players. Some say these are the most important players on any team's list.
I can't admit to fanatically watching any team (other than mine) nor any 6 particular players, so is my logic flawed? Possibly. Do you think I care? Nowhere near as much as you might expect. What I won't be doing is slagging anybody in particular, and certainly not a first year player. The players I have chosen are what I consider regulars, and not many first year players would therefore qualify.
What's the point of all this? Well, reasoning aside (and let's not focus on that, it's about the personnel), who would you have in the bottom 6 instead? Tell me; tell me now.
When it comes to the Cats, there are no easy players to pick, however ...
David Wojcinski
Missed out on a Grand Final berth last year, and really, probably not undeservedly. This guy has pace to burn. End of resume. How he is still on this particular list is nothing short of astonishing, but someone down at the Cattery must see something in him, as somehow he survives. Occasionally does something good, more often than not turns it over. Looking forward to someone, anyone, defending his spot and implying that he shouldn't be named in the bottom 6.
Corey Enright
What is it exactly that others, namely Geelong supporters, see in this guy? Is a reasonable, decent player at best, but I guess not everyone can be stars. Has played many more games than me I suppose, so must be worth something. Still, if it comes down to "should we pay Gablett that extra 50k" or "lose Enright", I'm comfortable with how those cards will fall.
Andrew Mackie
This is almost certain to get some noses out of joint, but probably not as badly as Joel Selwood's. Must say it's getting difficult to name players from a clearly dominant side, but you have to remember that this isn't simply about "who's crap", it's about "who's in the bottom 6". Luckily for me, Mackie is a bit crap and therefore his inclusion becomes something of a given. Probably takes on bigger blokes than normally expected, especially with Egan now gone for good, and he's certainly one of those triers. When weighed up against many of the other players in the team though, looks like one that could be replaced quite easily with many players running around in the comp.
Mark Blake
Another controversial pick, as he is winning some taps this year, but I think Blake might not be winning the hearts of the Geelong faithful as much as he did a few years ago, where the crowd cheered wildly if he managed to run 30 metres without falling over. Just not doing enough around the ground yet, but time is on his side. Assuming Mumford doesn't overtake him when Ottens gets back. Look, I think this bloke can play, but at the moment he can be exploited.
Harry Taylor
Didn't want to pick on Harry too much but his skills enable him to be selected in this formidable group. A lot of upside to his play, but he must go in hard at the contest, and hopefully can bring his skill level up by foot, and by hand under pressure.
Josh Hunt
Had to think hard about this one. Hunt certainly goes in hard, but is imminently replaceable. Looking through the list who played against the Bulldogs and thinking about who is missing, here was one player who looked like it didn't really matter whether he ever came back. The defense might be a little light without him, but Rooke and Milburn play the sniper roles enough, they don't really need a third.
Until the next team's bottom 6