Prediction Round 5: Changes Vs Essendon + pre-match discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

A moron is a coach that sexually harasses women, treats players/assistant coaches/staff like shit when things don’t go his way.

If JLo’s weakness is honesty and fan engagement than so be it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lyon isn't relevant, a coach saying anything followed by "please don't share this info to anyone" on social media to a random fan is shockingly poor professionalism.
 


NOD still in!!! We had nothing to worry about!!!

If Erasmus had switched to the HFF and stayed in instead of Banfield it would be been better. Anyway the pressure is on to get the result after this selection so hopefully they can get the job done.
Excited to attend my first freo game if the year this weekend, yet to watch us win a game at marvel since I moved to Melbourne a few years ago so fully expecting that to change this weekend given where both sides are at.
 
Pleasantly surprised by this.
As much as Logue was outstanding in the last term and could’ve been given another game, they have clearly identified a preferred structure and Pearce trumps Logue in same role.

Erasmus has had a taste, but if we’re fair dinkum he wasn’t brilliant against GWS and can learn.

Not rushing Tucker back or perhaps suggesting NOD or others have earned their right to stay is also great. Same could be said about Wilson.

Banfield has also done little wrong, so coming in from sub to best 22 also creates a level of selection integrity.
 
My main concerns were that Walker, Erasmus and NOD would be dropped so much happier with this.
I still can't comprehend why Banfield is even on our list let alone selected to play. He has never, other than pre-season played an effective game of football for us as a forward so his selection when we have such availability puzzles me.
I don't dislike the guy, he seems like a hard trainer and good clubman, I just don't think he should be playing.
Happy with the rest of the selections.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

My main concerns were that Walker, Erasmus and NOD would be dropped so much happier with this.
I still can't comprehend why Banfield is even on our list let alone selected to play. He has never, other than pre-season played an effective game of football for us as a forward so his selection when we have such availability puzzles me.
I don't dislike the guy, he seems like a hard trainer and good clubman, I just don't think he should be playing.
Happy with the rest of the selections.
He did kick 3 goals against the Hawks last year, but otherwise fair.
 
My main concerns were that Walker, Erasmus and NOD would be dropped so much happier with this.
I still can't comprehend why Banfield is even on our list let alone selected to play. He has never, other than pre-season played an effective game of football for us as a forward so his selection when we have such availability puzzles me.
I don't dislike the guy, he seems like a hard trainer and good clubman, I just don't think he should be playing.
Happy with the rest of the selections.
Not true, he has had good games at AFL level but he has no consistency, often follows it up with a disappearing act.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Round 5: Changes Vs Essendon + pre-match discussion


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top