News Hawthorn AGM 2022

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Does anyone know how the process of endorsement works from past players, coaches, and clubmen?

I'm curious how some of these endorsers would know the personalities of the presidential candidates or politics of the current HFC to voice their support.
 
Genuine question - how is it that you can deem letting the club president continually, ferociously and personally attack the government of this state when we needed them for funding - to the point where it then cost us said funding to the tune of $15-20M is doing a good job. On what metric is that kind of failure of leadership in any way quantifiable as good?
Dan s government has been polarising to say the least

He’s allowed to critique especially as an ex premier

The 15 mill funds are allocated and ultimately will be released

Good governance In making the right decision with coach , and with our economic management of club $
 
Dan s government has been polarising to say the least

He’s allowed to critique especially as an ex premier

The 15 mill funds are allocated and ultimately will be released

Good governance In making the right decision with coach , and with our economic management of club $
There's thoughtful criticism and then there's conspiracy theorist rubbish like that brain fart of a tweet saying we'd all be in lockdown until after Christmas (which was weaponised by all the right wing nutters as some kind of insider intel).
Jeff was all but daring the government to withhold the Dingley funding, it's political partisan madness. Can't stand him or his lackeys
 

Interestingly, this is the well articulated view of many prominent Hawks supporters and probably verbatim what Gowers, Sill and Merlino think, and yet if I had any criticism of each of their campaigning is that they’ve gone the super nice, inoffensive route.

Which may end up being the successful approach, but doesn’t necessarily cut through the way that Langers just has. The fact we have seemingly informed posters here saying “it ain’t broke don’t fix it” still, might be testament to that.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dan s government has been polarising to say the least

He’s allowed to critique especially as an ex premier

The 15 mill funds are allocated and ultimately will be released

Good governance In making the right decision with coach , and with our economic management of club $

I don’t give a toss about Dan Andrews or Labor v Liberal. I give a stuff about the Hawthorn Football Club. You can’t claim there is good governance on club finances when there’s a $15-20M hole in the budget for Dingley that we now have to eat into cash reserves for because our president couldn’t shut his bloody mouth for the good of our club. That’s not remotely in the ballpark of good governance.
 
Interestingly, this is the well articulated view of many prominent Hawks supporters and probably verbatim what Gowers, Sill and Merlino think, and yet if I had any criticism of each of their campaigning is that they’ve gone the super nice, inoffensive route.

Which may end up being the successful approach, but doesn’t necessarily cut through the way that Langers just has. The fact we have seemingly informed posters here saying “it ain’t broke don’t fix it” still, might be testament to that.
Well said.
 
Dan s government has been polarising to say the least

He’s allowed to critique especially as an ex premier

The 15 mill funds are allocated and ultimately will be released

Good governance In making the right decision with coach , and with our economic management of club $

His govts been so similar to Jeff’s own premiership it’s not funny. Only a few don’t see that
 
I could not agree more and have told my very close contact at H4C the same. Kennett and his colleagues will go hard. They will not “play nice”. H4C need to as well. It must go hard.

Langers just did. Dipper sort of and H4C have more to deliver.

Disgraceful them saying they can’t work with new entrants to the board, especially after spending months ‘finding’ there’s no aspirants than them?

You don’t own it guys. Maybe we’ll need to keep track of the vote in case they fall on their swords, and subs are required

And if dingley can’t proceed without the board being hands on, they’ve fukked that up too (of course it will)
 
Look forward to Andy being our next President.

Doesn’t get more scathing of current board from a much more revered & admired name than Langers. He speaks members listen. Hopefully he can get back & serve the club is some capacity under Andy.
 
I’ve read Gowers / merlino mantra

They have no substance and have used cliches and fluff on the main

The current board is doing a good job

“Time for change” applies to a mulfunctuoning board which is not the case here

If the whole board is United In it’s endorsements, than they (time for change camp ) are indeed renegades

This is not 1996 where we had a malfunctioning board

We have a strong United and sound board that deserves to be backed in
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top