Sydney don’t look anything like the side that dominated early in the year.
We broke them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sydney don’t look anything like the side that dominated early in the year.
The only reason that didn't get paid was the Collingwood player decided to bolt it while the umpire was telling the Sydney player to get back.Collingwood stiff at the end, a definite over the mark free kick not paid! To be honest glad to see the tiggy touchwoods not paid though, if only they'd do it all game... Been kind of hoping the Pies make Finals to shake things up (and keep Essendon or Carlton out), looks like not to be now... Swans found their spark, Lions look out!!
26 free kicks to Sydney, 15 to Collingwood late in the last. Reckon the Pies will be filthy. Which is fantastic.The only reason that didn't get paid was the Collingwood player decided to bolt it while the umpire was telling the Sydney player to get back.
The Free kick count is irrelevant26 free kicks to Sydney, 15 to Collingwood late in the last. Reckon the Pies will be filthy. Which is fantastic.
The Free kick count is irrelevant
Clear intent not to keep the ball in ... tapped straight to the boundaryIt's actually not, that's a pretty illogical thing to suggest.
There were also two late deliberate out of bounds in a row which we're quite line ball.
Clear intent not to keep the ball in ... tapped straight to the boundary
It just says how many frees were paid.It's actually not, that's a pretty illogical thing to suggest.
There were also two late deliberate out of bounds in a row which we're quite line ball.
The Cox one, yes, but the Moore one was pretty obvious I’d have thought.It's actually not, that's a pretty illogical thing to suggest.
There were also two late deliberate out of bounds in a row which we're quite line ball.
The Cox one, yes, but the Moore one was pretty obvious I’d have thought.
But there was also the incident where it looked pretty clear thAt Elliot? and ball were over the boundary line before he centred the ball into the 50.
Especially when you’re using an odd-shaped ball that can turn any which way at any time.That's thing about that rule "Insufficient Intent" we're here arguing/discussing what is & what isn't insufficient intent. It's just an awful, stupid rule. One could argue, as a commentator mentioned in last nights game, everytime a ball goes out of bounds it's insufficient intent.
The rule has evolved this year to the point that if you kick the ball off the ground & it goes out of bounds, it's deemed a free. If you give the umpires an interpretive rule, each umpire will interpret it differently. It's the rule that is the problem, not the umpires. The AFLW has it right, or at least better.
And that's how you undo itLions are currently absolutely doing GWS in a very similar fashion to how they did us
Wow, two big chokes by Brisbane and Norf.