- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #3
MRP / Trib. 2024 - MRO Chook Lotto - Carlton Tribunal News & Reports
- Thread starter Aphrodite
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Exactly, two players can execute the same run down tackle and the outcome is dependent on whether the player being tackled flops or can stand up in a tackle.
May as well ban any tackle that brings a player to ground, irrespective of the outcome, as they all have the potential to hurt a player.
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,502
- Nov 30, 2010
- 707
- 2,848
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,504
It’s still going …
Sounds like some face saving bullshit for Christian.
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,506
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,507
APPEAL!
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,508
I’m done 
Goodnight all.
Goodnight all.
On what grounds aph ….afl stupidity??
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,510
Last one …
www.carltonfc.com.au
Tribunal news: Owies learns Tribunal fate
The verdict is in for Matt Owies' AFL Tribunal case.
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,511
All of the above.
DigbysLovechild
Rookie
- Aug 29, 2013
- 35
- 200
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Someone should get Jeff Gleeson to get up and try and execute some of the garbage he always carries on with, such as Owies should have released an arm after the ball spilled free. You're talking about fractions of a second, 2 players running full tilt, all their momentum travelling forward etc etc.
Wickzki
Definitely Sam MacLure.
- Oct 1, 2010
- 26,112
- 62,701
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Ophidians Old Boys, Blazers, MCFC
Time to get the Young Niddrie Terrors involved mate.
T2B_
The Avo King
- Feb 13, 2011
- 54,081
- 92,432
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Tasmania Devils, Dragons FFC
Appeal appeal appeal
Lawyer here. Grounds 2 & 3 I can see. Don't see an error of law (though the ingenuity of counsel is ever surprising) nor manifestly excessive sanction.
I was being a bit facetious in saying “all the above”.
But it is interesting the tribunal guidelines define the charge of rough conduct as “any conduct which is unreasonable in the circumstances.”
What is unreasonable conduct.
Clearly the umpires deemed the act was a legitimate tackle and paid a free kick for incorrect disposal, and therefore considered Owies conduct was reasonable.
Maybe we should’ve asked the umpires to provide their interpretation and view of Owies’ circumstances as reasonable conduct as supporting evidence - as it seems to be at odds with the tribunal’s understanding.
- Aug 10, 2019
- 1,026
- 3,777
- AFL Club
- Carlton
You might have been being facetious but I’m not! All of the above damnit!!!!!
Fight fight fight!
We will never surrender.
- Mar 20, 2017
- 10,819
- 36,448
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I actually think that it probably did fall in the dangerous category.
It's only that it was about as dangerous as Jones' tackle that makes a mockery of the AFL.
It's only that it was about as dangerous as Jones' tackle that makes a mockery of the AFL.
Fight fight fight
O'Farrell clearly out of his depth. We all know it's Townshend who is the real brains behind our successful Tribunal appearances...sadly unavailable at this point.
Must admit I do have a laugh at these cases. Gleeson, Pane and a few others are all pretty good friends...and I can imagine the laughs that are had after some of these cases.
What an absolute bullshit decisions that is….
Owies executed that tackle perfectly
Owies executed that tackle perfectly
4flagsin5yrs
Premiership Player
They should appeal.
Similar threads
- Locked
