Can someone please explain to me what these pressure rating numbers refer to:
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Analysis Season 2024 - Statistics and Analytics Thread
- Thread starter Grasshopper17
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Oct 13, 2015
- 9,714
- 24,722
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Champion data pressure rating. I think I dug up an explanation of it at some stage but no clue where now. For refernce, Sydney's pressure rating was at 158 for the GF.
I think around 180 is afl average??
Elixuh
See you on the 9th green at 9
People are equating Sydney's pressure rating to them playing poorly rather than us executing exceptionally and keeping the ball off them. You can't pressure if you're letting us chip mark all day.
- Oct 13, 2015
- 9,714
- 24,722
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Agree, but they were putrid as well. Also heard a stat somewhere today that we had 55% possession of the ball in the GF, which is frankly ridiculous.
Elixuh
See you on the 9th green at 9
Agree, but they were putrid as well. Also heard a stat somewhere today that we had 55% possession of the ball in the GF, which is frankly ridiculous.
Most marks ever in a GF I think.
You know I'm no good at this stats and analysis stuff, I'm more of a Mark Robinson type, but I thought Sydney came in with a botched gameplan and our gameplan was what we had been working towards for 12 months. Tailored specifically for the MCG and winning a flag. I don't think their coaching gave them a great chance and you're right their players kinda looked stunned.
3rd lowest pressure rating in a Grand Final apparently.
KissKiss
Norm Smith Medallist
- Nov 26, 2012
- 8,511
- 10,687
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Its something like for everytime someone from the opposition has the ball how much pressure do you put on them. ie its a scale from being tackled as you try and get rid of the ball to being touched to being corralled to being completely open under no pressure. They score each of those (4 3 2 1) and then sum them up over the last 100 disposals or something.
As said 150 or below is really bad, 180ish is average to good, over 200 is really high pressure.
Section 5
Norm Smith Medallist
- Nov 26, 2018
- 7,003
- 10,984
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
This is from Champion Data 25/7/2023 he mentions Essendon, Swans, and Port as examples in a few cases.
This is for 8 minutes another goes for 20 minutes. The 8 minute one has enough for people to take in
Grand Final Stats Recap
Forgotten in the build-up to the 2024 AFL grand final, possibly in over-exuberance and possibly in trepidation, was the enormity of the task confronting Chris Fagan and his team.
Excellent article by Peter Blucher.
- Mar 12, 2003
- 5,382
- 9,759
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Brisbane
- Thread starter
- #286
Final rankings for the year. Our huge Grand Final win shot us up to the #1 ranking for the first time all season. It was only a matter of time but the model eventually got it right!
I'll probably look to roll out a new model for my seeds next season, hopefully (a) putting a greater weighting on recent form and (b) utilising more of Champion Data's "Premiership Metrics", which, to be fair, are gonna need a rework over summer given they had only Hawthorn and the Bulldogs as the only potential premiers at the start of the finals.
#1 - Brisbane 129%
#2 - Sydney 127%
#3 - Western Bulldogs 125%
#4 - Greater Western Sydney 116%
#5 - Hawthorn 115%
#6 - Geelong 113%
#7 - Fremantle 108%
#8 - Port Adelaide 105.8%
#9 - Collingwood 105.6%
#10 - Adelaide 104.4%
#11 - Carlton 103.6%
#12 - Melbourne 100%
#13 - St Kilda 95%
#14 - Essendon 90%
#15 - Gold Coast 89%
#16 - West Coast 64.4%
#17 - Richmond 64.3%
#18 - North Melbourne 63%
Nunez
Premium Platinum
Final rankings for the year. Our huge Grand Final win shot us up to the #1 ranking for the first time all season. It was only a matter of time but the model eventually got it right!
I'll probably look to roll out a new model for my seeds next season, hopefully (a) putting a greater weighting on recent form and (b) utilising more of Champion Data's "Premiership Metrics", which, to be fair, are gonna need a rework over summer given they had only Hawthorn and the Bulldogs as the only potential premiers at the start of the finals.
#1 - Brisbane 129%
#2 - Sydney 127%
#3 - Western Bulldogs 125%
#4 - Greater Western Sydney 116%
#5 - Hawthorn 115%
#6 - Geelong 113%
#7 - Fremantle 108%
#8 - Port Adelaide 105.8%
#9 - Collingwood 105.6%
#10 - Adelaide 104.4%
#11 - Carlton 103.6%
#12 - Melbourne 100%
#13 - St Kilda 95%
#14 - Essendon 90%
#15 - Gold Coast 89%
#16 - West Coast 64.4%
#17 - Richmond 64.3%
#18 - North Melbourne 63%
Forget champion data, use The Couch premiership window! Easy peasy!
- Mar 12, 2003
- 5,382
- 9,759
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Brisbane
- Thread starter
- #288
Nunez
Premium Platinum
- Mar 12, 2003
- 5,382
- 9,759
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Brisbane
- Thread starter
- #290
Also, https://afltables.com/afl/teams/allteams/last20.html is nice to look at right now. We rarely see the same team at the top of every table on this page.
Similar threads
