Player Watch Welcome to Port Adelaide Rory Atkins

Remove this Banner Ad

Regardless of the intense and in my opinion justified dislike many Port supporters have for Ratkins, even if he had no history of being an antagonistic dick head during his time with the tingles what was the f****** point of trading for a 31 yo old who couldn't get a game with gold coast!

It's just more proof if ever it was required that the real PAFC doesn't exist any more, and it never will again!
 
Take away the Crows history stench he's a better player than Toumpas, Jack Trengove, Bonner, McEntee, F. Evans etc etc.etc. it sucks however we've had worse and still do.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You don't trade players into your AFL list to prop up your reserves team you absolutely ***ed * campaigner. Piss off to Collingwood you career loser ken loving freak.

Did you miss the bit where he talked about adding depth and how (with injuries) those players inevitably play AFL games throughout a season?

People complain about lack of depth and then complain when we go get depth players. This is the AFL, most teams don't even have 23 AFL standard players on their list, let alone depth. The choice is either relative spuds like Ratkins or an 18 year old that we get with pick 70. If we choose the former you'll complain about spuds, if we choose the latter you'll complain about lack of depth. It's a no win situation due to a very shallow talent pool.
 
Did you miss the bit where he talked about adding depth and how (with injuries) those players inevitably play AFL games throughout a season?

People complain about lack of depth and then complain when we go get depth players. This is the AFL, most teams don't even have 23 AFL standard players on their list, let alone depth. The choice is either relative spuds like Ratkins or an 18 year old that we get with pick 70. If we choose the former you'll complain about spuds, if we choose the latter you'll complain about lack of depth. It's a no win situation due to a very shallow talent pool.
Missing out on the free agents also played into taking Ratkins.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Played three games and one of them was as sub.

Of all the bad things about the sub rule, the worst is the way it distorts stats and seemingly nobody makes any effort to take this into account when providing stats on individual players.

You continually defend players with this without taking into account that being the sub usually means you're almost too shit to get picked at all.
 
Did you miss the bit where he talked about adding depth and how (with injuries) those players inevitably play AFL games throughout a season?

People complain about lack of depth and then complain when we go get depth players. This is the AFL, most teams don't even have 23 AFL standard players on their list, let alone depth. The choice is either relative spuds like Ratkins or an 18 year old that we get with pick 70. If we choose the former you'll complain about spuds, if we choose the latter you'll complain about lack of depth. It's a no win situation due to a very shallow talent pool.
There have been and will be a large number of players delisted that could offer just as much (if not more) as Ratkins, aren't actively despised by an already disillusioned supporter base, and would be much cheaper. Why not just sign one of these players, to a 1 year contract on minimum wage, give the difference in wage to Butters/Bergman to make them happy instead of trading in Rory F'ing Atkins..?!?!?
 
You continually defend players with this without taking into account that being the sub usually means you're almost too shit to get picked at all.

He played a total of three games for the SUNS, of course he's shit. That doesn't mean you have to make him look even shitter than he actually is by using stats disingenuously (actually, in this instance, more like ignorantly).
 
Take away the Crows history stench he's a better player than Toumpas, Jack Trengove, Bonner, McEntee, F. Evans etc etc.etc. it sucks however we've had worse and still do.

Yeah dunno about that. He was an average player at his peak 7-8 years ago. The last 5 years hes been a complete spud. He is absolutely not better than any of those players now
 
Did you miss the bit where he talked about adding depth and how (with injuries) those players inevitably play AFL games throughout a season?

People complain about lack of depth and then complain when we go get depth players. This is the AFL, most teams don't even have 23 AFL standard players on their list, let alone depth. The choice is either relative spuds like Ratkins or an 18 year old that we get with pick 70. If we choose the former you'll complain about spuds, if we choose the latter you'll complain about lack of depth. It's a no win situation due to a very shallow talent pool.

Farrell, Bergman, Jones, Evans, Sinn, Burton, Burgoyne, Williams. Thats a lot of hbf depth as it is
 
its very possible at some time in 2025 we end up with a forward line of
CHF: Atkins Ratugolea Mead
FF: McEntee Evans Narkle

Looks like we took copping our first sanfl wooden spoon pretty hard so lets not sack the coach or think outside the box to recruit for them, lets pick up all the spud muffins in the AFL instead.

Remember this year when we were all bicep flexing **** the sanfl we’re joining the vfl reserves and yet we care so much about the sanfl now we are recruiting into it at the detriment of the AFL side. Show the current state of the club: we are all talk and no smoke
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Welcome to Port Adelaide Rory Atkins

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top