List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - The Final Countdown

[tigs2010]

Talent is talent! XL is going to be a player!

Yeah I think he will be able to play similar to Gulden type role tbh.

 

[tigs2010]

if only there was 2 of him

Ha savage.

 

[tiger_tough]

if only there was 2 of him

 

[Michaels]

Yeah I think he will be able to play similar to Gulden type role tbh.

Good call that!

 

[Wacky Tiger]

So the Crow boys seem pretty confident they have pick 2 stitched up to take Jagga

1 Rich - Lalor
2 Adel - Jagga
3 Carl - Draper?
4 Norf - Tauru
5 Dees - Langford
6 Rich - FOS

 

[tigerfan1961]

Cause he is shite

Serious or just trying to stir the pot. If it’s the former, you have no idea bud

 

[tigerfan1961]

Get it out of your head.

North is not sliding back to pick 10.

It ain't happening regardless of how much you wish for it.

Unless Tigers give up 6 as part of the trade, the deal will be made with one of Crows, Aints or Dees.

Take it to the bank or bookmark it if that is your preference.

Sent from my SM-A156E using Tapatalk

Enjoy pick 2 then, but next up is 62, a disaster made by your brilliant List Mangler

 

[Morro]

So the Crow boys seem pretty confident they have pick 2 stitched up to take Jagga

1 Rich - Lalor
2 Adel - Jagga
3 Carl - Draper?
4 Norf - Tauru
5 Dees - Langford
6 Rich - FOS

Blues surely take FOS?

 

[Wacky Tiger]

Blues surely take FOS?

Seems the main hurdle

 

[snails13]

Forgot about Paige Cardona what the hell happened to her

List Management GWS

 

[Noidnadroj]

Enjoy pick 2 then, but next up is 62, a disaster made by your brilliant List Mangler

Yep … could’ve been entering the world’s strongest draft with:

2, 25, 44, 62 and 67

But they do have a 28yo vertically challenged 28yo, a 32yo 293 gamer and a washed up KPF who hasn’t played good footy for 2-years on their books….

No wonder they finished second bottom having been rebuilding for 7-years.

If we finish second bottom in 2029 I’ll just about pack it in.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[snails13]

List Management GWS

Sorry think Emma Quale went to GWS LM

 

[Calcium Man]

Blues surely take FOS?

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

if only there was 2 of him

 

[prodigy]

This is likely my final attempt at how I think it will go.
One is a version where we trade 6 and 20 for 2.
The other is no trade.
Neither list include picks 23 and 24.

Trade version
1. Richmond - Lalor
2. Richmond - O'Sullivan
3. Brisbane - Ashcroft (matched Carlton's bid)
4. Carlton - Draper
5. Adelaide - Smith
6. Melbourne - Langford
7. North Melbourne - Tauru
8. St Kilda - Smilie
9. Gold Coast - Lombard (Matched St Kilda bid)
10. St Kilda - Armstrong
11. Melbourne - Travaglia
12. Richmond - Hotton
13. Essendon - Kako (Matched Richmond bid)
14. Richmond - J. Whitlock
15. West Coast - Allen
16. Port Adelaide - Shanahan
17. Fremantle - Reid
18. GWS - Lindsay
19. Brisbane - Marshall (Matched GWS bid)
20. GWS - M. Whitlock
21. Western Bulldogs - Oliver
22. Richmond - Hynes

Non-trade version
1. Richmond - Lalor
2. North Melbourne - Tauru
3. Brisbane - Ashcroft (matched Carlton's bid)
4. Carlton - Draper
5. Adelaide - Smith
6. Melbourne - O'Sullivan
7. Richmond - Smilie
8. St Kilda - Langford
9. Gold Coast - Lombard (Matched St Kilda bid)
10. St Kilda - Armstrong
11. Melbourne - Travaglia
12. Richmond - Hotton
13. Essendon - Kako (Matched Richmond bid)
14. Richmond - J. Whitlock
15. West Coast - Allen
16. Port Adelaide - Shanahan
17. Fremantle - Reid
18. GWS - Lindsay
19. Brisbane - Marshall (Matched GWS bid)
20. GWS - M. Whitlock
21. Western Bulldogs - Berry
22. Richmond - Hynes
23. Sydney - Faull
24. Richmond - Dattoli

* I personally want us to take FOS with pick 1 but this is what I think will happen more than what I want to happen.

 

[Wacky Tiger]

This is likely my final attempt at how I think it will go.
One is a version where we trade 6 and 20 for 2.
The other is no trade.
Neither list include picks 23 and 24.

Trade version
1. Richmond - Lalor
2. Richmond - O'Sullivan
3. Brisbane - Ashcroft (matched Carlton's bid)
4. Carlton - Draper
5. Adelaide - Smith
6. Melbourne - Langford
7. North Melbourne - Tauru
8. St Kilda - Smilie
9. Gold Coast - Lombard (Matched St Kilda bid)
10. St Kilda - Armstrong
11. Melbourne - Travaglia
12. Richmond - Hotton
13. Essendon - Kako (Matched Richmond bid)
14. Richmond - J. Whitlock
15. West Coast - Allen
16. Port Adelaide - Shanahan
17. Fremantle - Reid
18. GWS - Lindsay
19. Brisbane - Marshall (Matched GWS bid)
20. GWS - M. Whitlock
21. Western Bulldogs - Oliver
22. Richmond - Hynes

Non-trade version
1. Richmond - Lalor
2. North Melbourne - Tauru
3. Brisbane - Ashcroft (matched Carlton's bid)
4. Carlton - Draper
5. Adelaide - Smith
6. Melbourne - O'Sullivan
7. Richmond - Smilie
8. St Kilda - Reid
9. Gold Coast - Lombard (Matched St Kilda bid)
10. St Kilda - Armstrong
11. Melbourne - Travaglia
12. Richmond - Hotton
13. Essendon - Kako (Matched Richmond bid)
14. Richmond - J. Whitlock
15. West Coast - Allen
16. Port Adelaide - Shanahan
17. Fremantle - Berry
18. GWS - Lindsay
19. Brisbane - Marshall (Matched GWS bid)
20. GWS - M. Whitlock
21. Western Bulldogs - Oliver
22. Richmond - Hynes
23. Sydney - Faull
24. Richmond - Dattoli

* I personally want us to take FOS with pick 1 but this is what I think will happen more than what I want to happen.

No Langford in the Non-trade version?

 

[tiger_tough]

This is likely my final attempt at how I think it will go.
One is a version where we trade 6 and 20 for 2.
The other is no trade.
Neither list include picks 23 and 24.

Trade version
1. Richmond - Lalor
2. Richmond - O'Sullivan
3. Brisbane - Ashcroft (matched Carlton's bid)
4. Carlton - Draper
5. Adelaide - Smith
6. Melbourne - Langford
7. North Melbourne - Tauru
8. St Kilda - Smilie
9. Gold Coast - Lombard (Matched St Kilda bid)
10. St Kilda - Armstrong
11. Melbourne - Travaglia
12. Richmond - Hotton
13. Essendon - Kako (Matched Richmond bid)
14. Richmond - J. Whitlock
15. West Coast - Allen
16. Port Adelaide - Shanahan
17. Fremantle - Reid
18. GWS - Lindsay
19. Brisbane - Marshall (Matched GWS bid)
20. GWS - M. Whitlock
21. Western Bulldogs - Oliver
22. Richmond - Hynes

Non-trade version
1. Richmond - Lalor
2. North Melbourne - Tauru
3. Brisbane - Ashcroft (matched Carlton's bid)
4. Carlton - Draper
5. Adelaide - Smith
6. Melbourne - O'Sullivan
7. Richmond - Smilie
8. St Kilda - Reid
9. Gold Coast - Lombard (Matched St Kilda bid)
10. St Kilda - Armstrong
11. Melbourne - Travaglia
12. Richmond - Hotton
13. Essendon - Kako (Matched Richmond bid)
14. Richmond - J. Whitlock
15. West Coast - Allen
16. Port Adelaide - Shanahan
17. Fremantle - Berry
18. GWS - Lindsay
19. Brisbane - Marshall (Matched GWS bid)
20. GWS - M. Whitlock
21. Western Bulldogs - Oliver
22. Richmond - Hynes
23. Sydney - Faull
24. Richmond - Dattoli

* I personally want us to take FOS with pick 1 but this is what I think will happen more than what I want to happen.

No Langford in your non-trade version....

 

[tiger_tough]

Don't want FOS even at 6/7. Think he's a bust.

 

[prodigy]

No Langford in the Non-trade version?

No Langford in your non-trade version....

Oops. I'll edit. Thank you.

Fixed. Oliver slides as a result.
Reid I feel is a good chance to slide on the night.

 

[tigs2010]

No Langford in your non-trade version....

Relax. We shouldn't pay out people having a crack at a mock.

 

[tiger_tough]

Oops. I'll edit. Thank you.

Fixed. Oliver slides as a result.
Reid I feel is a good chance to slide on the night.

Should've just duplicated Lindsay.

 

[prodigy]

Should've just duplicated Lindsay.

Nah can't take that signature tech away from your fine self.

 

[Mr Magic]

Geelong’s drafting of picks inside 37 (I chose that number as they’ve had 3 x picks at 36-37) has been abysmal for over a decade - as in competition worst bad. One of their few hits was 200cm SDK, Shannon Neale looks pretty good and ruckman Conway looks promising.

2023 :
pick 11 : O’Sullivan
Pick 34 : Edwards

Too early, but trading 10 for 11 and 34 so Bombers could get Caddy looks like a real big error already.

2022:
Pick 7: Jyhe Clark.

Early days but pretty concerning. Ginbey and Phillipou chosen immediately after Clark.

2021:
Pick 24: Conway
Pick 25: Knevitt
Pick 32: Willis

Hmmmmm… concerning if Conway can’t get fit.

2020:
Pick 20: Holmes
Pick 33: Neale

Nice picks there.

2019:
Pick 16: Cooper Stephens
Pick 19: SDK

Stephens cast off to Hawks and no good. SDK a great pick.

2018:
Pick 15: Jordan Clark

Wasn’t much chop at Geelong but very good for Freo in 2024.

2017;
Pick 22: Fogarty
Pick 24: Tim Kelly
Pick 36: Constable

Kelly a great pick.

2016:
Pick 26: Parfitt (delist territory)

2014
Pick 10: Cockatoo

Horrible pick

2013:
Pick 16: Lang
Pick 36: Jansen

2012
Pick 16: Thurlow

2011:
Pick 32: Hamling
Pick 34: Kirsten

2010:
Pick 15: Schmedts
Pick23: C Guthrie
Pick 37: Horlin Smith

So in terms of ratings of top-37 picks for last 15 x years … 24 x picks:

A: 4
B: 1
C: 4
D: 5
F: 6
Too early: 4

So their KPP drafting has been by far their best with picks from first 2 x rounds of drafts.

Their later pick drafting, rookie picks, trades and father sons have been outstanding.

Their talent identification with decent picks has been an absolute abomination.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

what KPP's have they drafted???

Looks like part of their success is not having to draft KPP's especially tall ones

 

[Danog]

Yep … could’ve been entering the world’s strongest draft with:

2, 25, 44, 62 and 67

But they do have a 28yo vertically challenged 28yo, a 32yo 293 gamer and a washed up KPF who hasn’t played good footy for 2-years on their books….

No wonder they finished second bottom having been rebuilding for 7-years.

If we finish second bottom in 2029 I’ll just about pack it in.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

No issue with the Darling trade. 67 for him is fine.

44 for Parker and Konstanty is overs, but that's what you pay when someone is contracted.

25 for Daniel is a complete joke, contracted or not. Just say "**** off".

 

[BAFLD]

Why would the Crows trade at 2 to take Jagga when he will likely be available at 4?

Force North to take Tauru at 2.
Blues will take FOS/Draper at 3

Just doesn’t make a lot of sense