Breaks it. Generally if one team has red/blue or similar they get that arc. Eg Geelong would have got blue. Hawthorn often got red. Sydney/Bulldogs were red/blue respectively.
You missed the first part.
"And if Geelong are allowed in dark shorts then..."
IF they are allowed to wear navy shorts with the white top THEN Collingwood need a kit that is neither majority black or white, to contrast with both the white tops and the navy shorts.
Not saying they SHOULD be...
As the president of the away team he should have made sure they have a guernsey that will resolve the debarcle.
The two-stripe suspenders jumper from a few years back, for example.
Each team just needs to make jumper(s) to ensure they're good in all away matches.
Eg - Geelong only need white with blue hoops, and blue with white hoops for vs Sydney.
Horses for courses, not one size fits all.
Which is easily fixed by not wearing a kit in either of those colours.
For eg the old WCE tripanel. Don't wear colours that clash with navy or gold = no clash.
So simple.
You may have missed the "that doesn't clash" part.
The definition of what doesn't clash gets given, and then anything that doesn't clash is on the table.
"Large bits" on one = all bar the three stripes and on the other = none bar the wings.
That is to say, one is nearly all yellow, the other nearly all not.
To me there's more clash between the Hawks' tops and the umpires' than between the gold tops and the red tops.
Even the use of the white umpire shirts would have helped the whole scenario.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.