Search results for query: *

Would be terrible in Rules but in this kind of sport it's no biggie. Edit: yeah on second look it's not amazing!

But old joke 😁

Breaks it. Generally if one team has red/blue or similar they get that arc. Eg Geelong would have got blue. Hawthorn often got red. Sydney/Bulldogs were red/blue respectively.

At least now there is minimal risk of a player getting injured on the edge of it. Wouldn't that have been a poo-storm!

Or they're playing a team like GC where navy shorts isn't an issue. Let's not make blanket rules that are bigger than necessary.

And yet when Port wear a grey and white strip apparently it's not good enough.

I get that. I even bloody agreed with that. I said IF. IF they are allowed to, THEN... I even said that I didn't think it should happen. But IF, then.

You missed the first part. "And if Geelong are allowed in dark shorts then..." IF they are allowed to wear navy shorts with the white top THEN Collingwood need a kit that is neither majority black or white, to contrast with both the white tops and the navy shorts. Not saying they SHOULD be...

And if Geelong are allowed in dark shorts then Collingwood need a non black&white kit.

As the president of the away team he should have made sure they have a guernsey that will resolve the debarcle. The two-stripe suspenders jumper from a few years back, for example.

Which clashes with which dark jumper, when it's all light?

Each team just needs to make jumper(s) to ensure they're good in all away matches. Eg - Geelong only need white with blue hoops, and blue with white hoops for vs Sydney. Horses for courses, not one size fits all.

My bad, I thought you were referring to Port's black with white number panel. Which clash jumper were you referring to?

Which is easily fixed by not wearing a kit in either of those colours. For eg the old WCE tripanel. Don't wear colours that clash with navy or gold = no clash. So simple.

Or just get over it and celebrate your jumper as it is, and the fact that you can wear it pretty much every game ever.

You may have missed the "that doesn't clash" part. The definition of what doesn't clash gets given, and then anything that doesn't clash is on the table.

The away team should be choosing a kit that doesn't clash with the home team's.

So long as Geelong can wear navy shorts against red teams, that kind of thing too.

"Large bits" on one = all bar the three stripes and on the other = none bar the wings. That is to say, one is nearly all yellow, the other nearly all not.

At least that means they can't whinge if they get told to wear white. Not that it'd likely stop them.

Wasn't this part of the upgrade we've been hearing about that was all going to be ready for the GF?

Yep :)

Well the yellow would clash with the gold lion...

It was their first...AFL premiership :)

Port in SBS and BL in premiership kit would be a throwback.

Can you shine the ball with Dettol in these Covid days?

To me there's more clash between the Hawks' tops and the umpires' than between the gold tops and the red tops. Even the use of the white umpire shirts would have helped the whole scenario.

Nah it would have been "Geelong have navy hoops and navy shorts, there's no issue"!

What did you have in mind?

However the "Melbourne" logo is more a tourism (greater Melbourne) thing than City of Melbourne. The City's logo is different.