surely you can't suggest it's absurd to talk about the round 1 side now when this thread is pure speculation on that exact topic?
At the moment it's each and every player in that grand final teams spot to lose, this is just common sense.
Why do you think that changing this side just has to...
But this topic is 2018 best 22, why would our best 22 right at this point in time not be the grand final side? The coaches picked this side with all players on our list being fit except for Drummond.
Who you'd like to see develop and who you could see playing in the 1s in the future vs the best...
You're argument doesn't make sense though, why would we make changes to this side at the moment? This is currently our best side, we had no injuries last year, the coaches had the ability to pick the best possible side and they did that. Of course this side won't play all games in 2018 together...
I'm just not sure how the best 22 could be anything other than the 22 blokes that ran out there on grand final day.
I'm not saying that in the future, based on injuries and form there won't be changes, but given what we know currently I can't conclude anything other than the grand final team as...
Your team is pretty good mate, I suspect stoinis will open, if this occurs your going to want to play him over finch just because he'll have 2 games, personally I'd ditch okeefe, not sure he'll play the first game with Lyon being available, I think you need to get Luke wright who is only about...
I've seen some people advising others against, Hastings and Faulkner and these types of players. I don't agree, these players will have a double game round 1, it's a no brainer, as long as you can trade them out. My strategy is to have 9-11 out of my 11 playing players to be from stars, thunder...
Also wouldn't mind bringing some intensity to the contest, seeing bodies being thrown in And having a go, have a desire to tackle as well. Don't want to see that wishy washy attitude that relies on the other team being poor to win the ball.
Pretty tired of having the ball at half back and seeing no one move fwd of the ball. Then having to kick it long down the line. This is what we did in 2010. Wouldn't mind if the team evolved past this. Run take the game on, take a chance.
Both Richmond and Brisbane are playing poorly, have a look at the differences in the way the captains choose to deal with the issues
http://mobile.news.com.au/sport/afl/trent-cotchin-says-richmond-needs-to-improve-consistency/story-fndv8t7m-1227323218769...
I agree, we probably can't start Ablett, while I agree Rockliff is overpriced I think we need to consider that we need to have a captain option that can get huge scores, consistently and I don't know who outside Rockliff could? I think his price tag could be justifiable
I think with all the crap defence options, I think Lumumba has to be an option doesn't he? Much better at running to the right areas too based on his experience I feel, anyway I didn't catch the game vs the doggies, did he play in the middle like he did vs freo? Also do you think he is likely to...
If you're going to bet on NAB cup you will go broke every time, the number 1 motive of coaches is to get game time into players and not necessarily to win, there's so many factors in a NAB cup game you just cannot know unless you are the coach.
Not sure why there needs to be an upside when you are buying a premium mid like Barlow, you buy a premium mid because you want them to continue to do what they've been doing. ill be putting him in my team because I think he'll keep averaging around that 110-115 mark and also I like his...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.