Search results for query: *

No you don't.

Yeah I know, honestly I see Cotto beating Geale and then losing to Alvarez if he makes that fight like he said he will. Cotto and Freddie Roach really seem to be picking fights they think are the easiest. The day after Golovkin beat Geale Roach said he isn't at Cottos level and he hasn't...

I read not long ago that the WBC wont sanction any fights for him (except Alvarez) to defend his title if he doesn't. I read that it's going to be in the contract of Cotto vs Alvarez that the winner has to fight Golovkin or will be stripped of the belt. I agree though he will some how still...

By his logic and these statistics that would make Leapai chinny, right?

You have no idea at all what you're talking about. And the answer to your KO question, lost by TKO twice in MMA, none boxing Leapai has lost 3 times by TKO.

Cotto doesn't have a choice he is the WBC World Middleweight champ Golovkin is the interim WBC World Middleweight champ. If Cotto beats Geale he is aloud to fight Canelo Alvarez but the winner of that has to fight Golovkin.

Are they getting a refund? Really anyone who considers themself a fan should have known there was a big chance the fight would be the way it was, it's there own fault for pretending to be fans of the sport. It's like going to a rock concert and asking for a refund because you like rap music...

You can see by the what rounds have been scored to each fighter that they clearly put the score under the fighter not the colour like any normal person would. Mayweather clearly won the first few rounds pacquiao clearly won round 4. under there names it has them winning those rounds...

AKA could have 4 champions some time soon, Velazquez, Cormier, Rockhold & Khabib. Cant be doing to much wrong down there, injury problems should be fixed in no time anyway.

top one from his last fight was at 205 this is 185, bad pose to spot big differences and its not the same camera angle and lighting which can make quite a big difference in photos anyway, can see he is leaner but he is also a lighter weight class lighter, these photos if anything reflect more...

Or not because he is a free agent.

I really like this new draft, st kilda would be the biggest winner from this, I like Collingwoods picks too, would be great. What can you tell me about fordham? I dont know about him. Chances of webb at 48?

But talks about grundy like he is in his prime.....

Grundys stats are hard to find, if you can find some please post them. I did find these ones. Grundys averages. Dis: 15 eff: 72% Goals 2 Hit adv. 24 per game Sc: 130 Also a dual All Australian His best games were better than wrights best, I've already posted up stats from grundys best and...

I agree with this, he was hyped up so much that he couldn't live up to the hype. People were saying he would be one of the afls best rucks, that was never going to happen in his second season and wont in his third or fouth either. Over time, who knows. My opinion, I dont agree he disappointed...

I personally dont see how Wright is a 9 the last few years there have been a lot of better forwards than him. Boyd Patton Hogan Cameron Daniher Maccartin are all better and I could put a rating between them. Everyone is hyping him up to be something he can't be instantly like they did with Grundy.

People forget the hype Grundy had in his draft year and they will forget about Wright too in a few years when the topic is Wright (the worst ruck since Grundy) vs the future best ruck to ever play the game.

Most Collingwood supporters are not like that guy. He is the reason why pregnant people shouldn't smoke meth.

Name the last player to do as good as a ruck in there first few seasons who got drafted as a 18 year old. I personly think this is a shit comparison because one is a ruck and one is a forward.

Wright is a forward, Grundy is a ruck. I bet you can find a lot more forwards who did better than Wright before they got drafted than rucks who did better than Grundy. They both should be good players I think, I'd pick Grundy who had a better U18 season and because promising young rucks are...

None of that is true.

He has no idea what he is talking about before he said Reid was going to kick 60-70 next year now we only have two good forwards and he isnt one of them. He thinks Freeman is the next Ablett. He thinks Seedmans will be an all australian next year. Also said beams was our 5th best midfielder...

Hawthorn Port Adelaide Sydney Fremantle Richmond Geelong Gold Coast Adelaide North Melbourne Essendon Collingwood Brisbane West Coast Carlton GWS Melbourne Bulldogs St Kilda

By far the stupidest most delusional thing ive ever read on this site and I have read some ridiculous things on here.

B: Langdon Brown Toovey HB: Fasolo Frost Williams C: Varco Swan Sidebottom HF:Adams Cloke Blair F: Elliot Reid White R: Witts Pendlebury Greenwood INT: Seedsman Thomas Broomhead Goldsack EMG: Freeman Grundy Kennedy Crisp

One is a better forward the other is a better ruck. They are both going to be good players in my opinion. Ive seen a few people mention wrights stats from his best games this year so ill do grundys from his draft year. 33 disposals 10 marks 5 goals and 49 hitouts for sturt over glenelg. He also...

Much of a chance that Collingwood will take Wright with pick 5?

I would be happy if collingwood drafted these players, but with pick 30 if Maynard is available id take him if not id go Wigg before Vickers-Willis, wouldnt argue with any of them. What is your opinion on Wigg?

At the f/s bidding he went with the bulldogs pick number 5. Heeney went with number two so really he was the sixth player picked, still a great pick up with number 9. Not arguing he could be a great player just saying he wouldnt have went top 3

The abc rating system is so annoying I couldn't even finish reading it. It's honestly just crap because I dont think you know anything about the players so they are given a rating that tells us nothing. Any player drafted could be a star or an absolute ******.