Search results for query: *

Are you able to rename files or folder? Sounds stupid but I cleared a stubborn file recently by renaming it first. A long-shot to be sure but no harm trying...

Irregular user and haven't had/seen any since mid 90's when 1 was more than enough. Came across them and bought ten (as a longterm supply to mitigate difficulty in acquiring them) but we finished them all in one night.

How would you define mind altering? It is perception altering. Loosens the filters on incoming stimuli. It alters thought patterns when under effect insofar as one has to process/react to different data.

Yeah, not as potent as they once were. One used to be plenty for me too.

$10:eek:. But it's tame - need about 5 or 6 to go anywhere worthwhile.

A one inch punch is simply an exercise in efficiency, not thinking or 'brain power'. No more magical than a David Gower flick off the pads.

Furry muff. It must have changed when PSOs were introduced.

Are you equipped to clear up above? Do AOs retain powers to physically detain and arrest&release? Is your knowledge first hand?

If this is true they have had their powers stripped/truncated. Not sure how they could do their job in any meaningful way. Not necessarily a bad thing.

Well Done.

I can assure you this is not the case. Anyone can physically detain you - if they have 'finds committing' condition covered - for any offence. AO powers go further again.

Connem. Paid by company. Authority however is state delegated and, although conditional, is very real. Public employees by proxy. Arrest & release differs from citizens arrest (s458 arrest).

It must have changed recently then. They always had them. I had those powers not many years ago delegated from secretary of DoI - not Vicpol related.

In Victoria they are delegated the power of arrest & release.

Whatever his training prescribes which I'm guessing doesn't mention pile-driving her into the tiles.

This. Poor behaviour nonetheless. If it were my daughter (after I got over the AO and subsided from Defcon1) I would be disappointed.

Not according to the Transport Act and its Regs. In breach = infringement. Don't misunderstand my point, I reckon the AO did the right thing if he/she believed your daughter was genuine. But it took the officers use of their personal discretion to override the shitty way the system is setup...

Not defending passengers actions. AO actions were far worse though - I can't see how that isn't an assault upon the lass (from silent vid perspective). Certainly not proportionate. AO is an adult and also held to higher standards. Incredulous that she is charged yet officer is not is all.

She was surrounded by a number of larger, well trained*, capable* professional*revenu 'customer service' officers. Are you saying her escape was inevitable without a bodyslam? That it was necessary?

Indeed. It's an indictment on the selection process and also the training they receive.

Haha. I picture this.

, but none of the countries would be talking to each other.

This. If you remove the assumption that they make decisions for the peoples benefit instead of corporate bottom line a lot of their 'dumb' decisions suddenly make sense.

You guys are ****ed, I'm outta here. *backs away slowly maintaining eye contact*

KTI it appears that the official explanation satisfies you. Bully for you. Seriously, I mean it. It must be nice to have it all packaged up neatly. I don't. You gotta accept it, it's time to move on. If I had an alternative take that would explain events coherently and disprove official...

:eek:Holy shit. Again? Where do you guys get the time and energy?

I currently have neither intention nor time to get involved in circular argument. In order to mitigate getting sucked into the vortex you can file the reason I don't believe as 'I got a feeling'. But please understand I'm not trying to convince anyone what I believe is right. I saw the...

How is this relevant to what I posted? Evidence is provided by someone to back up their story if they want it accepted as fact. I don't have a story despite your insistence I manufacture one. I just don't believe someone elses. Not at all. Explain why. I don't think you can. Until you can...

I'm not able to because I'm not sure one exists in the public domain yet. But I am able to accept that fact. When I see an explanation congruent with what occurred this may change. I'm not promoting anything other than highlighting the broken logic being used in this thread requiring an...

Slight retraction. 'At least as much' is less demanding than 'must be more plausible'. But irrelevant nonetheless because you are assigning credibility to official story for no other reason than it is official. This is your default position. The premise your argument sits upon. It is...